This is what is impossible for VA to justify - they can't charge double what EY charge their own members and just think 'oh well, our members won't notice'
Why do they need to justify it?
It's also reasonably on par with Qantas too (see my posts about zero innovation in loyalty and FFPs copying each other).
This is the brilliant part about running your own currency - you control the value of both earn and burn. Inventory to a lesser degree too.
Virtual currencies have little to no regulation - and as uncle Dave says - they're worth trillions but technically don't exist.
End of the day anyone at Velocity will run a pretty visual report which strengthens their own decision making process:
- The changes had minimal to no effect on EY redemption pre/post changes
- Of the EY redemption, Velocity generated $x in new revenue
- No impact on point sales to financial institutions
- Of the gold/plat members who have booked EY awards in the past, their spend did not change over the same period
What this won't (and can't) show is:
- The number of points warehoused with banks which had potential earmarking for Velocity that now don't.
- Varying points transferred from warehouses into non-velocity air partners (uplift to competitors).
- Factor of members sentiment when they go to book an award and find it's 500% more expensive in 6,12,24 months...
- Potential impact of funding the difference with a points increase instead of cash component (eg: increase award to 350,000 return and no tax)
- The effect on 'splitters' who fly EY/VA and can credit to either partner which will now credit all to EY.
- Ongoing chipping away degrading the value of the program which is leading to loss of overall customer loyalty in the airline business (documented in many industry publications).
- Influential partners who book award flights on behalf of pax which will no longer suggest VA funding EY flights as an option
I think Velocity took the easy route by slapping an additional fee.
There are other ways to fund any potential price increase by EY which wouldn't have negative side effects.
As consumers if we want to avoid these BS fees and zero creative thinking by V employees who are taking the easy road - we need to effect change by modifying behaviour so that as a collective group we move the needle on key metrics which they will measure on a daily basis.
This means stop sending points to Velocity if you don't agree with their changes - especially if you've ever redeemed or an EY flight in the past.
Otherwise - they will justify the change as a success by looking only at the statistics they want to extract.