Moody
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2008
- Posts
- 859
That was your first mistake: Common Sense - it's not PC!
Or common ...... but it's the same with Common Decency.
That was your first mistake: Common Sense - it's not PC!
There are forums online in which parents discuss some of the precautions they take with their nut allergic children when flying...clothing covering exposed skin, masks, taking handy wipes to pre-clean surfaces like the arm rest, seat-back tray, seat-belt etc. Many mention that the aircraft carpets are often covered in dropped nuts and sometimes there are nuts left on the seats.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
I used to work with someone who was refused a ticket (AUS to NZ) unless he had a doctor's certificate, medication and equipment to inject himself in case of anaphylactic shock in flight. His susceptibility to attack was low, but he was honest and sensible enough to declare it when buying the ticket.
I have moderated my view somewhat after researching nutter's forums (my term not theirs) comparing ideas on how best to travel. There are alternatives to serving nuts in the air and I would be just as happy nibbling an alternative snack with my drink.
This does not alter my view that people travelling with allergies need to fly prepared, taking their own precautions and alerting an airline well ahead of a flight (one week has been discussed) if they have special needs. Parents who just turn up for a flight with an allergic child with no protective clothing, hyper-allergenic mask etc, expecting the world to bend over backwards to accommodate them should be charged with neglect.
I guess others may have different views.
I find it useful to substitute 'severe nut allergy' with 'disability' and ask whether, in that context, the actions of the airline, passengers and commentators are appropriate.
would we say a disabled person should 'stay at home'? or that a disabled person is 'unreasonable' asking for additional assistance when flying?
if the answer is 'no' (which is the correct answer), why so harsh on the person with a nut allergy? should they not be afforded the same assistances?
Isn't the point that airlines DO require advance notice of someone who has a disability that would mean they require assistance in the event of an emergency?
With some they require that the disabled travels with a helper to ensure their safety.
In this "Nuts" case (I have waited this long but cannot any longer - Nuts on Board - wasn't it referring to the girl's parents and relations not to the food?) the parents appeared incapable of administering the epi-pen. If the daughter was as allergic as implied then this cannot have been the first case of her needing it administered.