Oneworld Classic Flight Reward Discussion - The Definitive Thread

I used UL as part of my ongoing OWA. I went MEL-CMB-DEL. The flight to CMB was heavily delayed, went via SYD and the catering was awful. The seat lacked storage and was not very comfortable. The lounge in CMB was great and has delicious Sri Lankan buffet food. The flight to DEL was much better and had Sri Lankan food, albeit on a narrowbody plane.
 
Has said I could book CMB - MEL online and call them up to link bookings but a) CMB isn't somewhere I can make a booking from and b) even if I did LHR - CMB/CMB - MEL I'm right in saying it wouldn't qualify as a 318k OWA ticket with two bookings linked?

Anyone know why they can't see the availability for that flight at all (let alone married segment issue) despite me being able to book it?
Seems you got an incompetent CSA. You cannot ever link separate bookings into a OWA even through the call centre. Re what availability they can see, you should just ring again and hope you get someone more knowledgeable to speak to.
 
Turn business expenses into Business Class! Process $10,000 through pay.com.au to score 20,000 bonus PayRewards Points and join 30k+ savvy business owners enjoying these benefits:

- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Urk a bunch of flights have dropped off mine suddenly. PRG-HEL-xWAW-DOH-DEL. The QR sectors (WAW-DOH-DEL) will be gone for sure.
 
I'm in the same boat as you k_sheep, just saw your post and decided to check my OWA as I have a business class Qatar flight (Barcelona to Sydney), realised that it has dropped off and I'm no longer ticketed. I had added a flight segment to my booking a couple of days ago, took 5-6 calls to hassle Qantas to ticket within 24 hours but eventually got there. I thought it was all fine since I paid the taxes & points and received a new itinerary with new ticket numbers. Seems that even when you have a ticketed booking, your flights can still drop off.

Just called Qantas and they said they have put in a reinstatement request to Qatar. Does anyone know what the chances of this reinstatement being successful are, and how long it typically takes to find out? If reinstatement is unsuccessful, should I push for Qantas to re-book me on a Qantas flight? Would appreciate any other advice on what to do here.
 
I recently returned from my 6th OWA and happy to report despite my fears eveything went smoothly no cancellations and no lost luggage so I didn't need to contact the QF CC. I must add due to earlier cancellations and the hopeless QF overseas CCs I think I made over 50 calls to put it together. It caused a lot of stress and weeks of sleepless nights and there were a few times I felt like giving up. I enjoyed J on QF 787s, the BA J A380 doesn't compete. I was denied access to the AS lounge at SFO as my ticket was deemed an "upgrade". Impressed by the IGA lounge at IST though and the T5 BA lounge at LHR was over crowded and looking tired.
I have already booked another OWA for mid 2023, still monitoring if some flights become available that I could add but not sure I can cope with the stress of dealing with the CC, also hoping there won't be as many cancellations next year neccesitating call with the CC.
 
Does anyone know what the chances of this reinstatement being successful are, and how long it typically takes to find out? If reinstatement is unsuccessful, should I push for Qantas to re-book me on a Qantas flight? Would appreciate any other advice on what to do here.
I sadly haven't heard of any tales of reinstatement requests being successful in the dozens of incidences on this forum alone :( The good news for mine is I was planning on changing the date of those flights anyway, otherwise I'd be stuffed (QR at xmas time - no chance at this late date).

My advice would be look for an acceptable solution on QF flights - if pushed they can convert paid flights to award bookings. But only on their own metal.
 
A number of members have reported trying to add a FF seat to an existing reservation when they can see a seat available on Qantas but the call centre agents can't. I ran into this today, not on a oneworld classic award but a regular frequent flyer booking on oneworld carriers and I think I may have some insight.

I was trying to change an existing, 3-leg itinerary ex-Paris. The already booked reservation included a LHR-HEL and that's what I wanted to change to a few hours earlier. I could see the seat on Qantas and ExpertFlyer showed one seat left. The agent couldn't see any seats in either class. While we were on the phone, I booked online the seat she couldn't see and expressed my aggravation at having to do it this way as I was now unprotected on an onward long-haul leg.

The agent looked into it and her conclusion was when I asked her to make the change, she was looking at availability priced in euros, not British pounds. I asked if this was a point of sale thing and she said no, just the system or screen they use. When she later looked for seats priced in pounds, she also couldn't see any but that's likely because I took the final seat.

I think the takeaway here is that if you're trying to add a flight that's priced in a different currency to what the existing itinerary is priced in, you may get an error over the phone. I don't know if asking the agent to search for availability on the 'screen' that shows availability priced in the original currency would help (or even be possible), but it might be worth a shot.

I've now had a second experience with this.

Two days ago I wanted to add CX LAX-xHKG-MEL to an existing oneworld award. Like everyone else when they go to do this, the flights were available online, but when I asked the HBA-based agent to add them, he couldn't see them. I said I could see them online; why can't he? He told me there's often a "synchronisation issue" that means availability is not updated across platforms at the same time and that if I tried to book the seat myself, it would fall at the payment page. Challenge accepted! I proceeded to book and confirm the very seat he couldn't see. I gave him the reference and he went away to investigate. After a few minutes on hold he returned to the call to tell me that it's a limitation imposed by Cathay and out of Qantas's control.

There's obviously multiple accounts of this sort of issue occurring. I'm now convinced it's not a limitation of offshore call centres (either through incompetence or poor training). Equally, I'm not convinced that the two excuses I've been given (different available from different currencies (rather than point of sale) in the case of the AY issue and a third party limitation in the case of CX) are accurate. They may well be true but my feeling is it's a Qantas deficiency somewhere in the booking system and it's much easier to blame someone or something else.
 
I sadly haven't heard of any tales of reinstatement requests being successful in the dozens of incidences on this forum alone :( The good news for mine is I was planning on changing the date of those flights anyway, otherwise I'd be stuffed (QR at xmas time - no chance at this late date).

My advice would be look for an acceptable solution on QF flights - if pushed they can convert paid flights to award bookings. But only on their own metal.

I was successful in my reinstatement request with a dropped QR flight - my (long winded) post on the whole saga is here: "oneworld" award (132.4K/249.6K/318K/455K) Planning - The Definitive Thread
 
After unsuccessfully asking two Agents for a Reinstatement Request to QR, we tried the online feedback option . That resulted only in a form letter about travel insurance.
 
Last edited:
I have had a similar experience today - I have an existing J booking that I wanted to change due to cancellation of one of the legs. I did quite a bit of searching on the Qantas classic rewards search tool and came up with 6 new flight segments, all showing availability, but the call centre person told me those flights are "only for new bookings" and what she could change my booking over to was showing zero availability for all flights Australia to Europe Jul-Sep next year. Therefore she advised me to cancel the booking and do a new booking if I wanted to take those flights on the website.

Is this just a way of QF getting people to cancel their bookings, take the cancellation fees and churn us, hoping we will go away and find something else to use these points for? Honestly, though if you never get to use these points they are practically worthless.
HI Brideshead - sounds like you are on the mark...I'm in same position as you. I've had 3 calls so far to try and swap out a leg on my OWA when I found a better available leg. I am concerned they will cancel the whole OWA.
Lack trust they will do the right thing.
good luck
Oveur
 
I've now had a second experience with this.

Two days ago I wanted to add CX LAX-xHKG-MEL to an existing oneworld award. Like everyone else when they go to do this, the flights were available online, but when I asked the HBA-based agent to add them, he couldn't see them. I said I could see them online; why can't he? He told me there's often a "synchronisation issue" that means availability is not updated across platforms at the same time and that if I tried to book the seat myself, it would fall at the payment page. Challenge accepted! I proceeded to book and confirm the very seat he couldn't see. I gave him the reference and he went away to investigate. After a few minutes on hold he returned to the call to tell me that it's a limitation imposed by Cathay and out of Qantas's control.

There's obviously multiple accounts of this sort of issue occurring. I'm now convinced it's not a limitation of offshore call centres (either through incompetence or poor training). Equally, I'm not convinced that the two excuses I've been given (different available from different currencies (rather than point of sale) in the case of the AY issue and a third party limitation in the case of CX) are accurate. They may well be true but my feeling is it's a Qantas deficiency somewhere in the booking system and it's much easier to blame someone or something else.
Wow!

I would not have expected that sort of issue from HBA.

I know HBA agents are competent, but I really can’t understand how CX’s systems are so fine tuned that they can go into an existing booking and limit a completely stand-alone sector being added!

I suspect it is a QF imposed limitation of some sort, designed to reduce, more generally, maximum benefit being derived from any award?
 
Wow!

I would not have expected that sort of issue from HBA.

I know HBA agents are competent, but I really can’t understand how CX’s systems are so fine tuned that they can go into an existing booking and limit a completely stand-alone sector being added!

I suspect it is a QF imposed limitation of some sort, designed to reduce, more generally, maximum benefit being derived from any award?
I don't think the CX partition in the Amadeus ecosystem (QF is in there as well) would need to do that. A new standalone booking would not have the existing segments incluing in the flight details provided to CX, whereas adding to an existing booking would. So once existing segments are detected then the addtional ones are rejected and hence the failure.

Well thats a theory anyway.
 
I don't think the CX partition in the Amadeus ecosystem (QF is in there as well) would need to do that. A new standalone booking would not have the existing segments incluing in the flight details provided to CX, whereas adding to an existing booking would. So once existing segments are detected then the addtional ones are rejected and hence the failure.

Well thats a theory anyway.
Would that not just be for connecting travel either side of the CX flight that requires cx to check-in or receive a passenger for?

But more importantly, what motivation would CX have to restrict that? It is still selling the FF seat, I can’t see any revenue benefit.
 
Would that not just be for connecting travel either side of the CX flight that requires cx to check-in or receive a passenger for?

But more importantly, what motivation would CX have to restrict that? It is still selling the FF seat, I can’t see any revenue benefit.
Agree re CX motivation question.

In my experience Amadeus hosted carreirs will receive the entire itinerary of a booking that as segments on other Amadeus hosted carriers. A 'benefit' of sharing the same record locator.
 
Every time I book one of these 318J tickets, I tell myself never again... Qantas certainly does not make life easy.

Anyway, does anyone know if I will have married segment issues with separately searched Malaysian and JAL flights?

My routing of concern is:

KUL-NRT on MH
HND-HEL on JL

I found J availability on each leg separately.

There is less that 24 hours between flights, so this is a transit and not a stopover. I know I can't do JAL-JAL in this scenario unless I search KUL-HEL and find availability that way, but hoping I won't have issues with the separate carriers.

Overall routing is:

CBR-SYD-ICN (stop) - QF
ICN-KUL - (stop) - MH
KUL-NRT (transit) HND-HEL (stop) MH/JL
HEL - ORD (stop) - AY
ORD - HND (stop) - JL
CTS-HKG (transit) HKG-MEL - CX/CX
 
Every time I book one of these 318J tickets, I tell myself never again... Qantas certainly does not make life easy.

Anyway, does anyone know if I will have married segment issues with separately searched Malaysian and JAL flights?
The married segment issue only potentially comes into play when both flights are with the same airline, so you won't have this problem with separate carriers.
 
The married segment issue only potentially comes into play when both flights are with the same airline, so you won't have this problem with separate carriers.
Thanks, thought that was the case. Award isn't pricing as a OW award and that is the only thing that I think could be causing that...

Other than QF error.
 
Thanks, thought that was the case. Award isn't pricing as a OW award and that is the only thing that I think could be causing that...

Other than QF error
It's well known that CX frequently imposes a block on married segments transiting HKG, so your CX flights CTS-HKG-MEL could well be the problem. You can get around it by having a stopover in HKG rather than a transit. The theory is that they want to force you to spend some time in HKG so that you spend some money there.
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top