You may be better to create this as a series of one way trips point to point if it isn't going to be capped. Advantage is that each sector is more likely to be bookable online which avoids multiple change fees - disadvantage is you pay multiple cancellation fees if you change your mind.
I was thinking about this as well and it indeed is a viable alternative compared to having everything on the one PNR.
Other than possible multiple cancellation / change fees, what would be the other disadvantages of having point to point flights on separate PNRs?
At this stage, our flights would be at least 3 days apart from each other, so if there were any cancellations or delays, it "should" be okay considering the amount of time in between.
On the contrary though, if all flights were on the one booking and one flight is affected, Qantas should be able to assist to accommodate to change any other flights later in the trip?
I just had that problem on Saturday where the agents can't see the seats showing on QF website I think on the 6th call the agent could see and add the flight. Don't they all have the same reservation system?
Yep, it's a real annoyance tbh - why should one set of consultants (ie. the Hobart team) have no issues at all in seeing what is available on the Qantas multi-city portal and changing accordingly, whereas the majority of other teams have such difficulty / provide totally incorrect responses?
Due to this reason and previous OWA itinerary experience, I am considering just booking each business reward seat in separate PNRs to avoid such hassles moving forward, but I am weighing up the pros and cons of booking altogether, or booking separately.
I think at this stage tbh, I'm considering booking separately. I'll just have to cop up the 3% international transaction fee for the legs that originate overseas (if booked altogether, it would all be charged in AUD).