Define for us what you think "socialism" is.A handful of socialists are appearing in this thread. To refer a previous post:
“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.”
― Margaret Thatcher
Define for us what you think "socialism" is.A handful of socialists are appearing in this thread. To refer a previous post:
“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.”
― Margaret Thatcher
I wouldn't have picked you as someone who thought Gillard's Government was "well run".Julia Gillard's cabinet?
They're not "illegal".Why is stemming the tide of illegal queue jumpers unethical or morally bankrupt?
They're not "illegal".
They're not "queue jumpers".
What's morally and ethically bankrupt is a refugee policy based in trying to be so inhumane that refugees would rather be in warzones that seek asylum here.
Turning the boats as Abbott reckons he will ("wherever possible") is going to be unfeasible, not to mention a legal and diplomatic minefield.
.
That is gold.
Define for us what you think "socialism" is.
Presuming you disagree, care to enlighten us why turning back the boats won't be those two things?
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
I've actually given up responding with reasoned discussion on this thread as it is ignored. When I've made less rigorous points and outright opinion, or anecdotal info, only then does it get commented on. So there's no point really, is there.
Like capitalism is the philosophy of selfishness and gospel of greed ?The philosophy of failure and the gospel of envy
Turning the boats as Abbott reckons he will ("wherever possible") is going to be unfeasible, not to mention a legal and diplomatic minefield.
The charade ends when a boat starts to sink near a Naval vessel. The vessel then has to render assitance to the drowning mariners, who can claim asylum as soon as they are on an Australian Naval Vessel at which point they can not be turned back.
To turn boats back from your territorial waters is not illegal.Australia has a perfect right to do so.
So all this cough about TAs policy being illegal is just that,cough. As is this utterly stupid towing the boats back slogan.
Sounds like you've got a good handle on their tactics. How would you stop them setting out - and some of them drowning?Yeah, the boats can be refuelled and turned back while they are sea worthy. Which isn't what will cause problems.
What will cause problems is when Asylum seekers start sinking their boat within reach of the naval vessels. At which point assistance has to be provided and they can no longer be "turned back".
Make it easier and quicker for refugees to claim asylum from foreign locales.Sounds like you've got a good handle on their tactics. How would you stop them setting out - and some of them drowning?
Sounds like you've got a good handle on their tactics. How would you stop them setting out - and some of them drowning?
And 50% were not turned back for that very reason that they were not seaworthy.Yeah, the boats can be refuelled and turned back while they are sea worthy. Which isn't what will cause problems.
What will cause problems is when Asylum seekers start sinking their boat within reach of the naval vessels. At which point assistance has to be provided and they can no longer be "turned back".
Anyone think the people smugglers haven't smartened up since the boats were last turned back?
Cookies must be enabled. | The Australian
Looks like he's sunk 4.5% in a couple of hours - Newspoll has the Coalition cruising and Rudd losing.Today's Morgan Poll marks three weeks straight of a prediction of an ALP win, ALP 52.5% --> LNP 47.5% 2PP