Firstly, you're out of your league to brand the said member as a "troll".
I'll find that I'm frequently out of tune...
Secondly, are you telling me that for something as critical as your luggage, you were prepared to leave the airport without any record whatsoever of accountability of your case?
I guess I wasn't enough emphatic about the form. I wrote:
I look at the form, outraged and then I realize that instead of saying, hey mate, make sure you have this number before you leave the airport, the note next to the field says: "For office use only"
So I naturally only left the airport after getting my form. But few issues should be raised anyhow:
- If a form field says For Office Use Only next to the most critical form field, the form is badly designed. Had this field be a requirement this should be emphasized. Nonetheless, the form goes further and says that
"We appreciate your patience and will contact you as soon as possible to advise your file reference number and delivery details"
- IMHO, the simple failure to fill the form properly is already an iconic proof of total lack of care towards customer.
Yes, I expect the to receive proper service.
But lets continue...
(In this case, your file reference number or global tracking number?) How did you ever expect to think you were going to be able to track precisely where your luggage is? This is the same reason why invoices have invoice numbers, equipments have serial numbers, aircraft have registration numbers, your drivers license has an ID number, etc. etc..
Good point isn't? But that's what computer exist for. I still had my baggage number, I still knew my own name and airports involved in the incident.
Moreover, since each baggage is tagged with a number, any decent systems architect should be able to develop a system cross checking baggage tags with WorldTacer cases.
But the proof that it was fair to expect for Qantas Baggage Services in Sydney to provide me with the File Ref. Number, was the fact that once I started to raise local and international regulations and get stressed the Customer Center representative was able to find the same number Baggage Services said I should call Buenos Aires in order to get and there was nothing else they could do in Sydney.
Funny enough, the Customer Service representative said openly she spoke with the Baggage Services in order to get the File R.N., the same one that "had no way to help".
So yeah, Invoices have numbers and File Reference Numbers are really critical but I must insist:
* Qantas Property Irregularity Form does not states the number is critical, instead points that it is "for office use only".
* Only after I started to be rude enough to claim that I bought my ticket in Australia from an Australian company subject to Australian regulation, could someone be bold enough to raise from the chair and get the number that all the suddenly miraculously retrievable from other points of contact other than Buenos Aires.
I'd say be glad you have got your luggage and call it a novice error.
Not so fast padawan, I still did not receive my baggage.
In any case, perhaps QF could have handled it better, but since I have no idea of how you precisely communicated with them, I can't give judgement on the extent of that; taking your word as it is, fine - gripe about QF, but certainly there is more you could have done to help yourself and save some headaches.
Fair enough and I respect your constraints. It is hard indeed to see things fairly when they involve your own life.
Just because you are a Platinum doesn't make you a QF "your holiness". (I can't believe QF would let you do something like overdraw on your points account, and you're claiming that QF customer service is the worst in the world? Not simply "horrid in this case" but literally "the worst in the world"?)
Oh, don't get me wrong mate but we totally disagree on this issue. Yes, Qantas should treat me as "your holiness", but should do that just because I'm their plain simple customer. I pay for their service and I expect adequate service level.
Providing the so called "platinum status" to some customers is Qantas choice, not mine. This is what they sell, the image they promote, as such, it is their own business to manage their customer expectations.
My reference to Varig decision to put my FF balance on the red was exactly in relation to living up with the promises they make. Most carriers nowadays have FF plans but do they live up with the marketing?
Moreover, if QF truly have ground staff in EZE and/or GRU, then what on earth were they thinking when they got some schlub who can't speak decent English......
Feel free to call them and figure it out by yourself. ;-) Do you want the number?
To make it worse, there was ONE guy who speaks decent english, but sadly he failed to fill the form properly and he is currently on his day off... Not very exciting isn't ?