Proposed Social Media ban for under-16 kids

Do you support Social Media ban for under-16 kids?

  • Yes

    Votes: 28 53.8%
  • No

    Votes: 24 46.2%

  • Total voters
    52
I can't wait to see the day when:
1. technology would make the legislation totally irrelevant and useless
2. everyone flouts the law
3. the law is struck down by a constitutional challenge

Looks like I won't be voting for either major party in the upcoming election. So long.
 
Policy to the logistics of making it work IRL

The 1975 solution to a 2025 problem
This is a “you all get punished for the sins of a few”
It’s the teacher saying “you all gotta be quiet and if one of you isn’t, you’ll all have detention after school”

Dumb and dumber and then they wonder why they keep losing the voters

On the flip side
One life saved
Too often online complete strangers will write something obnoxious “because they don’t like your expressed opinion”. Personal name calling and OMFG on FACEBOOK of all places and they’re exempt from this legislation
 
So a 15yo non-resident can't access either? I can compare this to China's Great Firewall.
Overseas visitors and non-residents have to obey other Australian laws. This is fundamentally no different. But it smacks of politics getting in the way of good government, even if both sides were politicking.
 
I can't wait to see the day when:
1. technology would make the legislation totally irrelevant and useless
2. everyone flouts the law
3. the law is struck down by a constitutional challenge

Looks like I won't be voting for either major party in the upcoming election. So long.

That day is today for 1 and 2.
 
Overseas visitors and non-residents have to obey other Australian laws. This is fundamentally no different. But it smacks of politics getting in the way of good government, even if both sides were politicking.
What I'm saying is, politicians love to attack China for their authoritarian stance, yet the effect of this will be like China's Great Firewall. One minute you can access Google, the next minute you step foot into China and it's gone.
 
Realistically given there will be no formal validation of government issued ID there is no way to actually verify age other then the honesty system. This will make no material difference, it is purely virtue signalling.

In the event a kid commits suicide then they will try and blame the social media platform if the kid is on one, issue a fine but then lawyers will need to prove that was the sole cause and not other in person or direct messaging bullying.

Also if kid lies about age (or otherwise circumvents reasonable site controls) then its a case of parents notproperly supervising/parenting not the platforms fault.

If the major social media sites cop too many few fines, i imagine it will be cheaper for them to block all Australian IP addresses thereby blocking everyone not just kids. Meaning adults are excluded from making the decision to consume social media or not.
 
Curiously incoherent post @JohnK

You make a vigorous libertarian case and conclude with “the government should be doing more”. You can’t have it both ways

Apologies if incoherent.

The government should be doing more on things like companies ripping us off, drugs, criminals and making things fair for everyone.

Telling me how I should bring up my child and making that into law will only encourage me to disobey because I totally disagree with the proposed ban. I should be able to decide how to bring up my child without the government interfering. This includes compelled speech. Actually compelled speech has the potential to cause more damage.

I do break the law. I do u-turns on double yellow lines or unbroken lines because I don't want to drive up extra 150 metres, turn into narrow side street, do 3 point turn and then drive back down into my driveway.

I do break the speed limit occasionally. I think most of us do it? Right? It's not wrong because most do it and accept it.

I have been known to drink alcohol in my car but now I don't drink in Australia this is not an issue. P.S. I think 0.05 limit is stupid. I'm 140kg and can get to 0.15 before alcohol has any serious effect on me yet I'm treated the same as the 45kg person who is drunk on 0.02 alcohol.

We all break the law. Each of us decides how much of the law to break.
 
Also if kid lies about age (or otherwise circumvents reasonable site controls) then its a case of parents notproperly supervising/parenting not the platforms fault.
you can't be serious can you??

If a teenager circumvents site controls it's a case of parents not properly supervising/ parenting.

I'm sure you weren't meant to say that....blame parents? maybe you were.

I mean we allow young adults to pop illegal drugs at festivals, now taking a look at the pill, testing it & yep all good, go get off your head, we'll be here later place you in back of an ambulance, but use tiktoc, oh no, that's forbidden!
 
Australia's highest-earning Velocity Frequent Flyer credit card:
- Earn 60,000 bonus Velocity Points
- Get unlimited Virgin Australia Lounge access
- Enjoy a complimentary return Virgin Australia domestic flight each year

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

So under 16's are banned from social media yet some political parties are calling for 16 year olds to be given the choice to vote in elections.
Also those same parties want to allow under 16s to make irreversible and irreparable decisions about gender reassignment.
 
So under 16's are banned from social media yet some political parties are calling for 16 year olds to be given the choice to vote in elections.
The. The bans either laughable or “cringey uncle”

Either way it’s a BAD look
For one of the most educated countries in the world we apparently aren’t as educated as some would make us out to be

As I said Dumb and Dumber

Now where’s the Banned Word and statement. Listing
 
Last edited:
Back
Top