moa999
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2003
- Posts
- 12,349
Also still minimal engineering support in AUH where other airlines are getting prioritised.
Of note Etihad still has 5 (of 10) aircraft parked.
Also still minimal engineering support in AUH where other airlines are getting prioritised.
All I know is they are doing a 12-year check and that will commence mid next year. This is from my engineering friends.
Also still minimal engineering support in AUH where other airlines are getting prioritised.
And ... surely if the market was there for the big bird it wouldn't be doing seasonal turns to HKG.There are codeshares on AF/KL/AY (others?) both for QF code and those partner airlines on the QF to/from Oz.
Edit:
MU, FJ, BA, JL, 6E…
Also a lot of QF codes on 3K flights into Asia - of course!
Connections are important, but so is who takes the next leg. Plenty on here are more adventurous than many out there who are not looking for transits, but a continuous flight as many of my non-AFF friends tell me.The issue with adding capacity to SIN is the intra-asia connections only work from QF35 and the European flights have a much better connection from QF37.
Obviously people closer to the issue in a better position to know the reasoning / circumstance / requirements / capabilities, but I seem to recall QF used to get A380 work done by LH at Manila. Maybe not the same capabilities/booked out as well.
Only a relatively small number (well less than half) of QF pax to SIN continue on to LHRI see the issue with bringing back A380s on MEL_SIN, is what you do with the extra pax when you get there. Still only one daily flight out of SIN to UK, no QF flights to EU (like FRA back in the day). Not sure the holiday/business market in SIN is big enough to justify the extra A380. perhaps @madrooster has a view?
Agree, but flying more into SIN from MEL using A380 instead of B787 or A330 probably means more overall wanting to join QF1 wouldn't you think? I hear QF1/2 SIN-LHR-SIN is usually chockers. So that seems to be the constraint. Its not like the good old days back when QF had a lot more flights into LHR from SIN (was it two 747s before it was two A380s?).Only a relatively small number (well less than half) of QF pax to SIN continue on to LHR
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
SYD-SIN and SIN-LHR are both chockers but not with the same people. A lot of people get off in Singapore and then people off the other flights into SIN get on.Agree, but flying more into SIN from MEL using A380 instead of B787 or A330 probably means more overall wanting to join QF1 wouldn't you think? I hear QF1/2 SIN-LHR-SIN is usually chockers. So that seems to be the constraint. Its not like the good old days back when QF had a lot more flights into LHR from SIN (was it two 747s before it was two A380s?).
At one stage I think QF ran 4x daily 747's to LHRAgree, but flying more into SIN from MEL using A380 instead of B787 or A330 probably means more overall wanting to join QF1 wouldn't you think? I hear QF1/2 SIN-LHR-SIN is usually chockers. So that seems to be the constraint. Its not like the good old days back when QF had a lot more flights into LHR from SIN (was it two 747s before it was two A380s?).
Yes - 2 daily from SIN, 1 each from BKK and HKG.At one stage I think QF ran 4x daily 747's to LHR
Back in the day Qantas actually flew laps of the globe - in both directions. I can't remember the route but it was probably SYD-SIN-LHR-JFK-LAX-SYD and the reverse.Yes - 2 daily from SIN, 1 each from BKK and HKG.
SFO instead of LAX.Back in the day Qantas actually flew laps of the globe - in both directions. I can't remember the route but it was probably SYD-SIN-LHR-JFK-LAX-SYD and the reverse.
I sometimes wonder how much better Qantas would be today if it had of stayed in government ownership and was more able to concentrate on service than profits for shareholders.SFO instead of LAX.
They also had routes to London via Mexico and the Bahamas.
The History Of Flight Between The UK and Australia From 1935 Onwards
How flying between the UK and Australia has evolved from the first flights in 1935 which took more than 12 days.londonairtravel.com
I still think the issue is the number of seats out of SIN to LHR (or anywhere else they might choose). Without extra seats out, I doubt they need or want to put extra seats in. The extras are not going via SIN these days, they are going via PER.SYD-SIN and SIN-LHR are both chockers but not with the same people. A lot of people get off in Singapore and then people off the other flights into SIN get on.
Yes, going from a 787 to an A380 is an increase in capacity but it’s not huge in the grand scheme of things when you consider QF operates 2x daily from SYD and MEL, 1x daily from BNE and PER.
All I know is they are doing a 12-year check and that will commence mid next year. This is from my engineering friends.
Also still minimal engineering support in AUH where other airlines are getting prioritised.
Obviously people closer to the issue in a better position to know the reasoning / circumstance / requirements / capabilities, but I seem to recall QF used to get A380 work done by LH at Manila. Maybe not the same capabilities/booked out as well.
So besides OQC - which are the other two still stuck in AUH and when might we see them?Have heard next year for OQC as well. Supply chain is another factor driving this apparently.
OQK and OQLSo besides OQC - which are the other two still stuck in AUH and when might we see them?
If it has been there over six months already then it could be a while longer before it comes back. I guess they are trapped there too as they wouldn't be permitted to fly to another facility that could do the work sooner.OQK and OQL
OQL needs full cabin refurbishment too (It was the one that was flying with the old cabin).
OQK went there in February for maintenance. This is likely the next plane to return to the fleet.
when you say "full cabin" does that include economy?OQL needs full cabin refurbishment too (It was the one that was flying with the old cabin).
Still expected to be 2024 at last press release. And the Euro satellite (F2) is now into 2025 launch... On
Full cabin being minor upgrades to F.. and totally revised upper deck including J suites, larger PE section and blocked doors.when you say "full cabin" does that include economy?
Last time I flew on a refurbished A380 the economy seats were still the originals, and showing their age.