It's odd that they chose to expand on existing destinations (SIN, BLR, MNL) with the freed up A330s rather than look at new destinations. I thought KUL was a strong favourite given the
rumours (slide 24). Maybe QF decided not to use those A330s on a new destination as they clearly view the PVG suspension as temporary and would need to withdraw from a destination completely to resume SYD-PVG if they had launched new flights to a place like KUL? With these current changes, QF can just reduce frequency on existing destinations without withdrawing when they feel the need to resume SYD-PVG.
It's not the only flight between Australia and China.
So to get this clear, you want all flights between China and Australia to be cut just because they may have different strategic and military objectives to Australia?
China is a crucial economic partner of Australia. Air China, Beijing Capital Airlines, Cathay Pacific, China Eastern Airlines, China Southern Airlines, Hainan Airlines, Qantas, Sichuan Airlines, Tianjin Airlines and Xiamen Airlines continue to fly a multitude of services from various ports in China to various ports in Australia