jb747
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2010
- Posts
- 12,961
QF94 is going via BNE tonight.
Any particular reason? Weather is okay.
QF94 is going via BNE tonight.
Any particular reason? Weather is okay.
Did AJ send the 4th pilot on leave a day early?Only 3 pilot operation
On Tuesday 10 March, it departed LAX 42 minutes late at 2332 and should arrive BNE at its gate at about 0610 on Thursday 12. If it say departs after 45 minutes at 0655, it could be in MEL (given the one hour time difference) at about 1000-15. This should just be in sufficient time to form a punctual QF35 to SIN, the 1210 hours early lunchtime flight that soon will no longer be an A388 (though neither will QF94.)
Wednesday's LAX-JFK QF11 was supposed to be about 30 mins early however at the last moment before landing, the pilot had to abandon because the aircraft in front had not left the runway in time.While I don't normally mention early running, Thursday's QF11 from LAX pushed back 20 minutes ahead at 0800 hours, arriving JFK at 1540 hours, 50 minutes early. One can't say this has not previously occurred but it's very rare.
...Sunday's QF12 JFK-LAX is cancelled, got a notification and have been moved to an AA flight. Any idea why? Loads?
Yeah, it's possible that they'll only fly the 787 to LAX only and not to JFK.That's unusual, especially because QF15 from BNE is showing as operating on Sunday 15 March.
Ides of March hehe? AFFer and QFi staffer milehighclub may be kind enough to provide us with the reason, but given that 'The Oz' yesterday in a major story mentioned that a QFi flight from HKG to SYD in the last few days had just 39 passengers on an A330, one probably can't eliminate what you mention as a possibility.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
AFFer TheInsider in the last few months claimed that flights are not cancelled due to 'low bookings.' I didn't believe that then, and certainly don't now with COVID-19 resulting in mass cancellations internationally and now domestically.
Should bookings continue to plummet the major airlines must surely eventually have to sack more staff, unless they want to place them on leave without pay. In the latter situation, some may decide, depending on age and financial situation, to retire while others may try to find employment or self-employment in other sectors.
..You sound rather gleeful about the fact that people may (will) lose their jobs.
I expect that the very high percentage of casual staff are already feeling the pinch. Beyond that, they’ll burn all leave. That will get them a month or so. I don’t know what Australian law says about sending people on leave without pay. I expect that that isn’t actually an option companies can just chose, though they may offer it.
I have a couple of friends who are probably going to find themselves out of flying without getting to do their last flights. That’s just a bit of bad luck in that their 65th birthdays are going to occur during this period. Beyond that though, I’m sure the company would be quite happy if people choose to retire.