Qantas mishap leaves customers stranded on tarmac for five hours

Maybe both organisations didn’t have as many contingency options available because they were trying to minimise costs? The flip side to that is that maybe it helps keep airfares lower for all of us…
Given how infrequent these kinds of incidents are, that cost would most likely be negligible. Assume you spend $100,000 capital on equipment with a life of 10 years to provide an ability to disembark passengers from a plane anywhere within the airport. Then you have a poor guy on duty doing all kinds of jobs but kept for contingency purposes, hourly salary with on-costs $50. Plus some to maintain the equipment and operate it on the odd occasion it's needed.

Whatever the volumes are at OOL or any other medium / smaller airport, perhaps the increase in airfares from this would still be quite reasonable.

But the bean counters would ask the risk management for the likelihood of such a need (response: very unlikely) and then see red on an asset just sitting and waiting for these incidents (plus personnel who need the capacity to be pulled into the incident response). It comes down to what other contingencies can be implemented at a lower cost.
 
Australia's highest-earning Velocity Frequent Flyer credit card: Offer expires: 21 Jan 2025
- Earn 60,000 bonus Velocity Points
- Get unlimited Virgin Australia Lounge access
- Enjoy a complimentary return Virgin Australia domestic flight each year

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top