None of this applies to the US.Probably because the article is ignores status perks in its ranking which can be hugely beneficial especially in non US programs for those who actually fly.
Higher status pax can:
* earn double the points for the same flight as non status pax,
* be treated better during irrops,
* get priority access to seat releases and premium care teams,
* request release of reward seats
* get free seat selection and preferred access to best seats
* enjoy lounge perks .
Ignoring status perks in scoring usefulness is flawed imo, since status does contribute to how easily you can earn and burn points.
It is a fundamentally different market.
To point out just a few fundamental differences:
- Most points collectors do not need status for lounge access because they get it through a credit card.
- If a points collector cares about status, they get it through credit card spend or status matches (there is always 2-4 status promos going on in the US at any one time). Status from flying is an antiquated idea in the US confined to the dying breed of road warriors.
- Earning points from flying is another wholly antiquated idea in the US.
- There is nothing remotely equivalent to the WP/P1 award request release feature in the US.
- Seat selection comes through airline fee reimbursement credits on credit cards, not from status.