Or required exactly the same for ALL other airlines in Aust and those operating in/out of Australian airports
DJ do not do heavy maintenance in Aust & from newspaper reports pay maintenance staff & crew less
Should not the Government ensure an even playing field.
And as DJ do not have CL all pollies should loose the CL cards
Well that is from the commentary about the bill not from the bill itself. So bit hard to claim the amendment isn't grammatically correct.
In which the reference to the "bill needing to change" has little to do with the topic of this thread - that is already written into an act.I was specifically referring to the 49% ownership requirement as per what I quoted. As I understand that is already in place via the existing qantas sale act. I can't see bolding on iphone but none of the quoted text mentions the 49% ownership requirement as I read it. ...
Buchanan said "we have four or five flights a day" that begin a international leg and then continue domestically, primarily through DRW and CNS and "they help build viable services". Xenophon is questioning specifically of JQ 58 SIN-DRW-CNS, where customers clear customs in DRW and continue to CNS with the international crew "on $400 a month". Buchanan said that $400 is "completely false". Xenophon has asked, on notice, details of what international crew are paid. Buchanan adds "our Thai cabin crew are paid 10 times the average salary and 17 times the minimum wage".
Buchanan: "The average duty length for someone in BKK or MEL . . . is almost identical".
JQ58 SIN/DRW/CNS is the only flight whereby pax remain airside in DRW & clear customs in CNS. Ditto for outbound JQ57 where pax clear customs in CNS & remain in transit in DRW.
I don't know whether the crew only do SIN/DRW/SIN with another crew doing the DRW/CNS/DRW or whether they do the entire flight.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Joyce seems to be defending the decision to purchase A380s over the 777s. I'm fairly sure he said the original model could not fly to LA but the 777ER could. However, by that time, QF had committed to the A380s.
"Today we have this order of A380s that precedes the cost of the 777s . . . The A380 is the clear winner." Lots of defence of aircraft choice, including the 787.
Gallacher: "What's the average age of the Qantas fleet that the public travels on?"
Joyce: I'd have to take that on notice. I do know that the vast majority of the money we're spending is on the Qantas fleet".
Buchanan said "we have four or five flights a day" that begin a international leg and then continue domestically, primarily through DRW and CNS and "they help build viable services". Xenophon is questioning specifically of JQ 58 SIN-DRW-CNS, where customers clear customs in DRW and continue to CNS with the international crew "on $400 a month". Buchanan said that $400 is "completely false". Xenophon has asked, on notice, details of what international crew are paid. Buchanan adds "our Thai cabin crew are paid 10 times the average salary and 17 times the minimum wage".
Buchanan: "The average duty length for someone in BKK or MEL . . . is almost identical".
It is from the bill itself. I know it is a little hard to believe. I did a double take when I read it. :shock:
Actually it should, as that's part of the problem....
Whatever the average or minimum salary is for a Thai person working in Thailand should not come into the equation.
Correct. The 777 didn't have the Range to do SYD LAX.
Actually it should, as that's part of the problem.
The question Xenephon should asking is "How much an FA working for Air Asia X gets paid in relation to the average or minimum salary of thier place of residence?".