Re: QANTAS- Not to be trusted!
I did not say all business class was the same, but did say in the bit that you quoted that he was put in an EQUIVALENT class (on a different carrier). In the bit you didn't quote I went on to talk about how even on the same airline the offerings in the same class on the same routes vary, but the price does not. I even gave the example of a flight where an A380 was substituted with an un-refurbed 747. Different products, same airline but if this happens then Qantas has no obligation to the customer even though subjectively the customer hasn't received what they paid for. I reckon in this case BA premium economy is 100% an equivilent class, I also reckon if we got 100 people and said which is better Qantas PE or BA PE the result would be mixed. So giving a refund based on a subjective opinion doesn't seem right, moreso when you factor in the circumstances that lead to the OP being put on a different carrier. If the product was so inferior the PAX could have refused to take the seat and wait for the next Qantas flight, so there is also an element of choice on behalf of the passenger too.
As for your analogy of Jetstar, this is not compariable as Jetstar is 100% an LCC, re-do your analogy using a full service airline and then come back.
I think the OP does have a case in that the service they received was not up to the standards of the service they purchased.
So you are saying that all business class products are the same and all first class products are the same?
How would you feel if you had paid for a QF business class ticket MEL-SIN (not certain but I believe this would cost ~$5,000 return) and they put you on a JQ flight in *Class. Or better still how about if you had paid for a QF premium economy class ticket MEL-SIN (not certain but I believe this would cost ~$3,000 return) and they put you on a JQ flight in *Class.
Are you saing that by putting you into an equivalent class on JQ that they have fullfilled their end of the agreement? Just asking....
I did not say all business class was the same, but did say in the bit that you quoted that he was put in an EQUIVALENT class (on a different carrier). In the bit you didn't quote I went on to talk about how even on the same airline the offerings in the same class on the same routes vary, but the price does not. I even gave the example of a flight where an A380 was substituted with an un-refurbed 747. Different products, same airline but if this happens then Qantas has no obligation to the customer even though subjectively the customer hasn't received what they paid for. I reckon in this case BA premium economy is 100% an equivilent class, I also reckon if we got 100 people and said which is better Qantas PE or BA PE the result would be mixed. So giving a refund based on a subjective opinion doesn't seem right, moreso when you factor in the circumstances that lead to the OP being put on a different carrier. If the product was so inferior the PAX could have refused to take the seat and wait for the next Qantas flight, so there is also an element of choice on behalf of the passenger too.
As for your analogy of Jetstar, this is not compariable as Jetstar is 100% an LCC, re-do your analogy using a full service airline and then come back.