justinbrett
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2006
- Posts
- 9,737
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Oneworld
- Emerald
- Star Alliance
- Gold
I’m smart enough to realise that Qantas writes a formal letter to someone like ACCC they should write what they mean, not something else. And when they give a reference to support a statement, the statement should reflect what the reference says, not something else.
“Qatari” does not mean 'crew working as Qatari residents' (or even Qatari residents working as crew ) It means 'of Qatar'. International airline crew for a particular national airline can be residents of anywhere and that’s covered in what the reference actually said.I think many Qantas crew are residents of countries other than Australia.
Further, if Qantas was smart enough, they would’ve reference the EU situation you mention rather than referencing ECAC recommendations and implying some sort of jurisdictional decision there.
Its a sloppy and carelessly written letter and worthy of the name 'amateur' especially when you consider the recipient would be well aware of Qantas' past behaviour in relation to employment laws and the hiring foreign pilots and cabin crew.
I disagree. Qatari is the adjective. It doesn’t necessarily mandate nationality.
We would say Kiwi crew for any employee of JetConnect without requiring NZ citizenship. American crew, could involve a number of Mexicans and Canadians working with visas.
ECAC are the perfect body to cite as they set the standards for Europe.
Fortunately ACCC aren’t spiteful, they will address the concerns on merit without an agenda.