Then the people with cash or debit cards will be discriminated against and have to pay a higher price?We dont want surcharges depending on the cost to the merchant (these should already be part of the price!) The price should be the price!
it's the cost of doing business.So a direct merchant fee of 1.45% (square) can end up being 1.7% to the end user.
I disagree. Perhaps, what I find most irritating is paying many thousands of dollars to, say, Qantas with a Qantas branded credit card and being charged a fee for the privilege of doing so.The airlines method of surcharging is pretty fair. With the exception of Rex which requires you to visit an airport sales desk to pay, the major airlines do actually provide convenient ways of paying the advertised price without any surcharge. If someone wants credit card points on top of it, it’s only fair that they pay a surcharge.
For a quite a number of small business’s I bet cash costs considerably less to accept than electronic forms of payment in terms of the idea that cash can result in undeclared sales.it's the cost of doing business.
We don't see business charging a fee for handling cash.
This is already the law. Businesses can’t impose a card surcharge if they only accept card payments, because in effect that means they lied on the price tag. Surcharges are only permitted where customers can choose to pay in cash but don’t.
Maybe that sounds like a good plan then. Ban all surchages and the fees to merchants can go down.EU interchange fees are capped at 0.2% for debit cards and 0.3% for credit.
Australian caps are 0.22% and 0.88%
No caps in USA.
If they were to ban card surcharges there would probably be further downward pressure on interchange fees and therefore card benefits...