Re: RichardMel) *A, flying J, on any member airline, allowed to use any *A lounges, ta for that one.
Not exactly.
In general yes, but it does not always follow. Just as QR restricts access to its lounges to class of service, and there was the case of CX in SFO restricting access to selected QFF elites for some time until it got sorted out.. there are some exceptions. eg not all Star Alliance carrier lounges are eligible to Star Alliance passengers or only in certain circumstances. Common examples are SQ in SIN pushes *G members flying Y/Y+ into an inferior lounge while *A F passengers are pushed into the SQ F lounge - only SQ F/Suites pax get access to TPR (which is not technically a Star Alliance lounge). Likewise as I noted earlier the United Polaris lounges are denied to *G pax even when flying UA, unless they are flying UA long haul J, or another Star Alliance carrier in J - basically the UA Polaris Lounges are not available to elites but only on class of service (again like SQ F and J lounges in SIN).. Also LH F Terminal is ONLY available to LH F passengers (and LH top tier HON members, which is sort of like P1 I guess).. a F pax on SQ for example will have to use far inferior LH Senator/Business lounges (I always get the two confused as to what is "better" I think the Business Lounge).
However, in general, pax flying premium cabins on Star carriers can access other alliance members lounges, but this is not universal.
Just as with oneworld not all airline operated lounges of member carriers are available to alliance partners.
The question I have is how much does data come into play into managing what is loaded of the different options? I imagine QF (and indeed any airline) should be able gather good data around what dishes are selected on any given route in any given season, and cater accordingly. Granted on specific flights you could encounter problems, on balance throughout a year it should not be a systematic problem, especially if they overcater by 1 or 2 meals on each dish (or do they just cater the exact number of dishes and not over cater at all?)
Some years back did a tour of QF Catering in BNE which was very interesting. There are a few docos on airline ops out there too that cover catering and it's very much a mix of historic pax demand data and logistics They'll look at things like general pax mix and preferences on certain routes, as well as cultural requirements (eg no pork to/from DXB).. route specific demand patterns would be things like more asian sty;e food options to/from Asian ports and the like.
The reality is though it's all a bit of guesswork. There's no way to predict what any particular pax will desire on any particular flight and unlike far smaller cabins like F it's not possible to massively over cater (and as mentioned above QF don't do a lot of that unlike some other carriers like SQ or EK who will take the hit for pax satisfaction). Looking an an A380 for example you need to cater to over 400 pax (let's keep crew separate) and have some mix of options but you just do npt have the room or realistic ability to carry enough of every meal option on each sector - there would be so much wastage and cost in food bill, fuel etc that it's just not going to be an option.
And food needs to be prepared hours before a flight and be frozen up and sent to the aircraft a specific time before departure, say 45 minutes or so.. so late changes, upgrades, etc can put a spanner in the works (hence the infamous "Catering Not Assured" messages).
One thing I would say to those that want far more chance of a hopefully acceptable meal or at least a guarantee of one(as much as can be) is to go for a special meal because those are catered separately. Now again if late changes are made this can obviously mess that up, but they definitely track the special meals and work to manage them as best they can.
I recall in BNE on the tour one of our group had a special meal request in for their flight which was some hours away. When we were there they actually located that meal sitting in the cart ready to go. That was pretty cool (literally too
) and we saw the displays of flight status, meal requests, pax numbers as that current time representing the mix required.
It is a very big logical operation not only to try and eensure the quality of meals and numbers, but obviously the safety of the meals and the time sensitive process of meal prep - cooking and making sure they are packed away quickly to avoid any contamination or risk, things like salads being made in specific conditions and all sorted in the required time.
And yes, obviously, things happen. Sometimes the meals go astray, the mix is not right because say an extra 20 pax go for the fish instead of the pasta, or someone makes a human error with handing out a special meal (that seems really odd to me but well.. human error). and when irrops strike, people chop and change flights, miss connections etc, the whole system can get thrown out of the window. For example I remember being on a flight delayed by a bunch of hours.. they hit some limit where all the catering that had been loaded was deemed out of date and had to be chucked. IIRC this was an EK flight.. they sourced new catering but obviously no menus matched and it was all a bit hit and miss (I was in F IIRC).. the food was still great but it was obviously not what was expected but.. these things happen. That made it actually kind of exciting tbh
I think as airlines contemplate ever longer sectors, like 20 ours that food becomes so much more critical. I mean if you can't get something acceptable to eat on a 3 hour flight you'll survive.. but 12, 15 or 20 hours? That's a whole other thing.. specially for folks with dietry requirements, allergies etc and poses another part of the challenge for carriers like QF to consider.