777
Established Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2009
- Posts
- 2,781
Europe is talking austerity whilst increasing spending and money supply-not real austerity.Go and look at Germany's budget figures.
You have conveniently ignored the Japanese experience-22 years of stimulus and still no end in sight.And the USA is hardly a role model for stimulus.
Europe is not increasing spending - certainly not in the basket case countries. I think the correlation between austerity and economic performance is obvious:
As for Japan, well there's a strong argument that having got through it's "lost decades" with low unemployment, stable politics, etc is not exactly a failure. If you take into account the size of the Japanese bubble (remember when there were small parts of Tokyo worth more than the entire state of Qld?) the consequences for the society to date have been far milder than Spain (30ish percent unemployment and counting) for example that has tried to cut it's way back to prosperity. Lots of counterfactuals involved but hard to argue it's a failure compared to other.
The problem is that spending by governments has been excessive for several decades encouraging consumption.I doubt that hair of the dog is great for countries economies.
Indeed but Keynesian economics 101 is not that governments should always spend it is that government policy should be countercyclical. So the time to run a surplus is when the economy is strong and the time to run a deficit is when the economy is weak. Which was the point above that started all this and you don't seem to be refuting again.
By the way I actually dont support the European so called austerity problems.I think the best thing for Greece to do is default on the debt.have a really bad couple of years and then resume real growth as Iceland has done.Problem is no politician is willing to admit they can get things wrong.
I agree. But that would be terribly Keynesian! The argument for austerity is what... again?