Does anyone know what "Sic'em Rex" is supposed to mean?
You've probably got to be at least 40 to understand that ..
(Warning ... semi-NSFW)
Does anyone know what "Sic'em Rex" is supposed to mean?
I was just about to post the same thingYou've probably got to be at least 40 to understand that ..
(Warning ... semi-NSFW)
Merriam Webster says:
1 : chase, attack —usually used as a command especially to a dog sic 'em.
2 : to incite or urge to an attack, pursuit, or harassment : set sicced their lawyers on me.
So, I'd say it means go get QF/VA/JQ.
So, here's a random thought, if per chance Rex can actually sustain a presence in the jet market, do we think there is any chance of them trying to partner with United, once international travel recommences, and become codeshare, interline and Mileage Plus partner?
REX wouldn't have any freight services AFAIK.If we go by the historic AFF article on costs to fly aircraft, it put it at about $10,000 to fly a 737 MEL-SYD, requiring an average of $60 per seat. Plus additional revenue from freight.
Let’s say an 80% capacity and fares of around $79, we must be getting close to a break even?
Interesting to see what happens with SQ (if Rex wants partners), given Rex's connections to Singapore, and if VA-Bain will be able to restore a relationship with SQ, or if ZL may muscle in?
Doubtful, without even having their own frequent flyer program as yet.Maybe Rex could join Star Alliance then
Looks like VH-PAG made its debut from MEL this evening, operating ZL152 and turning around in SYD as ZL161 both of which ran late...Rextremely late!
go by the historic AFF article on costs to fly aircraft, it put it at about $10,000 to fly a 737 MEL-SYD
The proud partners makes it look like an advertisement for a sporting team more than an airline...
Seems like we are back to the VA1 type style advertising - really pathetic IMO.The proud partners makes it look like an advertisement for a sporting team more than an airline...
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Except the VA1 advertising was at least reflective of the brand they were buildingSeems like we are back to the VA1 type style advertising - really pathetic IMO.
Seems like we are back to the VA1 type style advertising - really pathetic IMO.
me too!!I was just about to post the same thing
Perhaps Temasek might want to buy PAG's stake in REX, much like their simultaneous interest in VS/VA during both their administration processes.Interesting to see what happens with SQ (if Rex wants partners), given Rex's connections to Singapore, and if VA-Bain will be able to restore a relationship with SQ, or if ZL may muscle in?
IMHO, Rex is going for the anti-brand look, deliberate or not? Australian aviation has had more than it's fair share of "slick" branding, I mean the last thing we need is another QF wannabe, like VA tried to be after transforming from DJ.
This won't appeal to many on here, but probably will to a chunk of the public.
You've probably got to be at least 40 to understand that ..
(Warning ... semi-NSFW)