dot
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2007
- Posts
- 772
I generally wear business casual on flights - good jeans or chinos, polo shirt and dress boots.
The whole subject makes me wonder about the Airlines attitude to standard of dress. As the OP mentioned, he was "inspected" to ensure he was appropriately dressed. Many moons ago, on my first J International flight for business on QF to NRT, I was told to be smartly dressed. Recently, on a DONE4, my brother-in-law (First Officer for BA) put in a good word for me to get an upgrade to F across the Atlantic. He told me NOT to wear jeans since wearing them would put my upgrade in jeopardy.
The F upgrade came through and I noticed that most of the F pax were more casually dressed that I was (no shorts, but it wasnt the weather or destination for it) - many in jeans.
I would have thought that in this day and age, with business casual becoming much more prevelant, the Airlines would have got over the idea that F (or J or Y for that matter) pax should 'dress up' for the flight. Don't get me wrong, I am in favour of minimum dress standards, but I also think that pax should be comfortably dressed, especially on longer flights (please dont ask me to wear a suit across the Pacific!) - and if that means jeans, cargos, shirts without a collar, PJs, track suits etc then fine, go with it.
Has anyone experienced preferential or otherwise treatment because of your atire? How do you know it was your atire that affected things? Which airlines?
The whole subject makes me wonder about the Airlines attitude to standard of dress. As the OP mentioned, he was "inspected" to ensure he was appropriately dressed. Many moons ago, on my first J International flight for business on QF to NRT, I was told to be smartly dressed. Recently, on a DONE4, my brother-in-law (First Officer for BA) put in a good word for me to get an upgrade to F across the Atlantic. He told me NOT to wear jeans since wearing them would put my upgrade in jeopardy.
The F upgrade came through and I noticed that most of the F pax were more casually dressed that I was (no shorts, but it wasnt the weather or destination for it) - many in jeans.
I would have thought that in this day and age, with business casual becoming much more prevelant, the Airlines would have got over the idea that F (or J or Y for that matter) pax should 'dress up' for the flight. Don't get me wrong, I am in favour of minimum dress standards, but I also think that pax should be comfortably dressed, especially on longer flights (please dont ask me to wear a suit across the Pacific!) - and if that means jeans, cargos, shirts without a collar, PJs, track suits etc then fine, go with it.
Has anyone experienced preferential or otherwise treatment because of your atire? How do you know it was your atire that affected things? Which airlines?