Lynda2475
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Posts
- 9,174
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Red
- Oneworld
- Emerald
Why not? King Charles is a fine servant of Australia.
LOL does absolutely nothing for Australia
Why not? King Charles is a fine servant of Australia.
That's as may be but he is a total failure at representing Australia to the world. Paul Hogan does a better job.Shows how hardworking the royals are and exposes the whingers who complain about cost etc.
Why not? King Charles is a fine servant of Australia.
Senior magistrates interpret the law. Parliament makes the law, and the people change the Constitution. Anything out of whack gets fixed after a few votes.I'm not a fan of "reintepretation" being placed in the hands of the unelected.
Change it but do it the proper way...
We've done just fine so far. Ever since the Balfour Declaration/Statute of Westminster the PM has selected the G-G and the monarch has no choice but to accept the nomination. King George V wanted someone else - a British general - but he got overruled by James Scullin.It's never been about how good a job they've been doing (we've had a great Queen and a bad GG in the past), the million dollar question is how do you appoint the head of state and keep it an apolitical position.
Paul Kelly - the ultimate expert on the dismissal - wrote a book on the palace papers. What emerges is that there was no conspiracy. The Palace was hoping that Kerr would sort things out without any fuss; the last thing they wanted was any involvement. Kerr wanted to keep HM informed and sent over stuff, including newspaper clippings, showing what he was doing. Not that the Queen could do anything except act on advice from the PM. Presumably, the British High Commissioner was keeping his government informed.If you are referring to "The Dismissal", then the Monarchy did nothing then, either. The recently released "Palace Papers" of the National Archives confirmed that, without a doubt, and blew away all the silly conspiracy theories.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Charity: Im not sure cutting ribbons canbe classed as support, but I suspect they do get not eyes on the charity. I would put them in the category of an "influencer" - but obviously with a robust following.The monarchy actually does a lot for Australia. Inspiration and support to charity, as a symbol of culture and tradition, and as an impartial constitutional umpire that underpins our democracy, liberty and prosperity. Maybe you find those qualities amusing but they're rather serious and important to reasonable Australians.