TomVexille
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2013
- Posts
- 11,087
Given the volume of data centres being built in western Sydney, and the strong industry links to SIN. I can see some business traffic there.
The 5th daily was back over peak season this last year, and as of October, it will be back year-round, so it would be a shift of an existing flight, not a new one: Singapore Airlines NW24 Service Changes – 11AUG24 — AeroRoutes.SQ currently only has 4 daily flights to SYD (and 1-2 on Scoot). They had a 5th before covid, which routed via CBR on the return in order to get out of SYD before curfew and not have to arrive back in SIN at 3am. SQ has not yet restored that 5th flight. If WSI doesn't have a curfew, they might resume it once the airport opens and not "need" to route via CBR.
I wonder if QR would do the same? Would WSI count towards the 28 they are allowed per week into Australia's 4 major airports?
I doubt it would count, especially seeing as how it didn't exist when those agreements were written. I think QR would jump at this opportunity, and I'm sure the government would welcome them with open arms.
"Taxi to M7 hold short M12"I can see it, QR will fly DOH-SYD-WSI so that they can increase their flight frequencies into SYD.
I can see it, QR will fly DOH-SYD-WSI so that they can increase their flight frequencies into SYD.
Either that or move all pax flights to WSI, both domestic and international.
Offering $1.01Placing bets now - that won't happen.
If SYD-CGK-SIN was my normal route I'd pay extra to fly direct, no matter the distance and the tolls.$’000s off a J fare I might consider it but it’ll still be easier to fly SYD-CGK and on from there!
AVV is counted as serving Melbourne i.e. 28 total for QR includes PER, BNE, SYD and MEL/AVV. So I daresay a similar arrangement applies for WSI/SYD - the air services agreement lists cities, not airports.I doubt it would count, especially seeing as how it didn't exist when those agreements were written. I think QR would jump at this opportunity, and I'm sure the government would welcome them with open arms.
So QR should adopt the argument made by some here that WSI isn’t actually in Sydney .So I daresay a similar arrangement applies for WSI/SYD - the air services agreement lists cities, not airports.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
East Katoomba AirportSo QR should adopt the argument made by some here that WSI isn’t actually in Sydney .
yup, Western Sydney stops at Pyrmont. Then it's East Penrith.So QR should adopt the argument made by some here that WSI isn’t actually in Sydney
This will be like NRT and HND, they will have to have shuttle buses to get people across/cross the 2 airports.
If you run a shuttle service to say the CBD (which is fairly possible) then one possible route is literally using the M5 and it'd take you via SYD. So you might as well run a WSI -SYDT1 -T2/3 -City service and pick up more PAX.This is unlikely to be required, maybe shuttle buses will exist for the odd backpacker that books the cheapest flights on separate tickets without really understanding where they're going, but 99.9% of travellers will never go between the two airports. When do people go between Gatwick and Heathrow, or between JFK and EWR, or between TSA and TPE? They simply don't need to.
In the context of this thread, the fact that SQ may be serving WSI is irrelevant if you're flying from another port in Australia, you will most certainly continue to transfer at SYD in the near term. Longer term if a significant domestic network does develop at WSI, then yes you might connect to an SQ flight there, but in neither situation would anyone ever need to transfer between SYD and WSI (outside of the odd disruption where WSI might become a weather alternate for SYD, esp after curfew).
12 hoursI can't wait for the future Reddit posts of people asking whether they can walk from WSI to SYD domestic