AnonymousCoward
Established Member
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2005
- Posts
- 3,203
Of course we can all post. Just saying that posting the same opinion multiple times suggests badgering to make me change my opinion. As I said I've answered your basic question a number of times in thread. I would suggest that's a starting point before you continue badgering me. Otherwise, I still find a response of "thems the rules" to be unimaginative.
You requested earlier:
See this is what I knew would happen, people who think I'm complaining about not changing my one particular flight. Thank you for your input, now if it's ok with you, I'd like to put aside one single experience and discuss the big picture of what these types of things say about Qantas' direction as an airline. After all that is what I've been talking about.
I know it'll be hard for some to put aside their personal digs at me and discuss the big picture. But the rules have been mentioned by you all. well done.
OK - as you requested, let's put aside this one incident, and not make it about you personally. Let's talk about the "big picture" (your words)
Here's the "big picture" - QF finance people have been beavering away trying to find ways to cut costs or make more money. Why? because the airline is in the pits.
So, they have these rules in place to justify charging higher fares for essentially the same hard product. They are now enforcing these rules (or at least the CSR you dealt with claims as such), because they've probably gone and done some modelling that shows that this is best for the airline.
So, in the "big picture", your personal feelings don't count. They've probably already attempted to factor in the fact that they'll lose a few customers. They reckon they'll make more additional revenue through pax buying more expensive tickets, than they'll lose through annoyed customers who choose to take their business elsewhere.
So, there's the "big picture". Sorry if you think that's "unimaginative" - doesn't make it any less real.