Melburnian1
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2013
- Posts
- 25,432
Today (Tuesday 4 April 2017) VA23 (five times a week) commenced between MEL and LAX. It is punctual (thus far.)
Interestingly the returning westbound VA24 is timed into MEL at 0545 hours, quite a lot earlier than nonstop competitors QF and UA. Some businessmen and businesswomen may like the earlier arrival time, given that one usually has to add in excess of half an hour to get through immigration, checked bag pick up and customs, but at busier times later in the morning this can (if one is unlucky) take well over an hour. "First arrival advantage."
It will be interesting to observe over the coming months if VA manages to grow the market or merely cannibalise passengers from its competitors.
The load factors will be harder to judge because BITRE does not disclose (dissect) them down to individual route by each carrier, and since VA flies from LAX to BNE and SYD as well as (now MEL), one won't be able to calculate the percentage of seats occupied (or indeed the yield.)
One wonders what percentage of potential patrons, or their bricks and mortar travel agents, know that VA is operating on the route. My guess is many do not. VA's brand awareness may well be very low in the good ol' USA despite its existing tiwn Oz - LAX routes.
VA's history with its longer distance international routes such as AUH does not inspire - it has made an art form of announcing then cancelling routes - but perhaps this time there is room for a little guarded optimism.
The lack of a daily schedule is a disincentive to use VA. I wish transport operators (not just air) would realise that daily or better is the way to go, although in VA's case even if it wanted to it would lack the necessary number of suitable aircraft.
Interestingly the returning westbound VA24 is timed into MEL at 0545 hours, quite a lot earlier than nonstop competitors QF and UA. Some businessmen and businesswomen may like the earlier arrival time, given that one usually has to add in excess of half an hour to get through immigration, checked bag pick up and customs, but at busier times later in the morning this can (if one is unlucky) take well over an hour. "First arrival advantage."
It will be interesting to observe over the coming months if VA manages to grow the market or merely cannibalise passengers from its competitors.
The load factors will be harder to judge because BITRE does not disclose (dissect) them down to individual route by each carrier, and since VA flies from LAX to BNE and SYD as well as (now MEL), one won't be able to calculate the percentage of seats occupied (or indeed the yield.)
One wonders what percentage of potential patrons, or their bricks and mortar travel agents, know that VA is operating on the route. My guess is many do not. VA's brand awareness may well be very low in the good ol' USA despite its existing tiwn Oz - LAX routes.
VA's history with its longer distance international routes such as AUH does not inspire - it has made an art form of announcing then cancelling routes - but perhaps this time there is room for a little guarded optimism.
The lack of a daily schedule is a disincentive to use VA. I wish transport operators (not just air) would realise that daily or better is the way to go, although in VA's case even if it wanted to it would lack the necessary number of suitable aircraft.
Last edited: