It's an unfortunate pun, but this has hit the news today:
Smelly problem on Virgin flight to Sydney forces plane back to LA
Given that this is one case where passengers such as the lady quoted are unlikely to be incorrect, why did the Virgin Australia public relations employee try to deny that it occurred?
Wouldn't it be preferable to admit that there was a problem and explain why it occurred (if the reason had been established?)
or a mix of both?
What explanations or excuses (if any) do the 'tech crew' give and does this vary?
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
On a busy day (Boxing or St Stephen's Day) marked by generally good punctuality, unfortunately passengers on VA679, the 0905 from MEL to PER have only just taken off at 1423.
Bored at work the other day i bought the Flight Radar app, now bored at home while the missus is catching up on MKR i am playing with it and VA1535/Hobart/Syd is doing happy laps around Sydney, currently 50 odd minutes late.
VA895, the 2030 hours from MEL to SYD being operated by E190 VH-ZPA must have a dispensation from 'the delegate' to break the SYD curfew as it did not take off until 2200 and is therefore allegedly due to arrive SYD at 2314 (although it will touch down before this time, so may only be a few minutes into curfew.)