- Joined
- Aug 27, 2004
- Posts
- 17,627
- Qantas
- LT Gold
- Virgin
- Red
- Oneworld
- Sapphire
Re: Visa Waiver Programme - Newbie
But didn't you plead guilty to the crime?In summary they want me to bend over backwards and dig up the past just for them. This is reverse Common Law - guilty till proven innocent.
It only takes precedence in Australia. In the USA, US law is all that matters. So for entry to the USA, its US law, and not Australian law, that matters. The US Immigration Officers at LAX airport are only able to apply US law to people wishing to enter the USA. US law has no concept of someone being found guilty and the conviction not being recorded.The fact is the matter resulted in "no conviction recorded" under Commonwealth Law, which takes precedence of US Law, as im a citizen of the Commonwealth.
Application of logic is not a requirement. If you want to enter their country, you need to follow their process.Plus the additional expense of going to Sydney for an interview, because they dont believe Brisbane is worthy of its own office - how convenient. I find it intruiging how people who are found drink driving and minor traffic violations are given the red carpet treatment.
As far as the US is concerned, you pleaded guilty to a crime. Rightly or wrongly, whether a conviction was recorded or not does not seem to matter to the US Department of Immigration. US law does not understand the concept applied under Australian law where someone can plead guilty and not have a conviction recorded. In the eyes of the US Department of Immigration, it would seem that the recording of the conviction is irrelevant. Its the finding of the court that is relevant, and in you case it would seem the court found you guilty as a result of your guilty plea, but the judge decided not to record the conviction.Honestly, im being treated as a criminal, despite not having a criminal record.
Unfortunately your firm belief, no matter how much based on logic or Australian legal process, does not change the way the US Department of Immigration views the circumstances. Ultimately they have the ability to choose who they admit to their country. As foreigners, we have very few rights when it comes to entry to the USA.So, I don't know what to do in relation to this matter. I firmly believe any petty matters which result in "no conviction recorded" should entitle the person to visit the US based on the conditions of this verdict - not have the US say "stiff ****" and use coercion to do what they want.
The advice you were given 10 years ago to plead guilty and not have a conviction recorded may have been sound advice when it comes to the Australian legal system and making the "problem" go away, but as you have found there may be other implications that you were not informed about at the time.I also dont know the chances of a Visa being issue in relation to my matter, and no one can give me any idea of the outcome - all on hope. I find it intriguing that the country with the most imprisoned population, is telling me that something that occurred many years ago of a petty nature is severe enough to refuse my application under the VWP. The US system is a joke - literally.