What VA will largely pick up from a NZ merger/takeover will largely be Trans-Tasman, by allowing NZ to do all the work there, and just put a VA code on the existing NZ schedules (with marginal increases and upgauges), all of Pacific Islands west of Fiji including Honolulu, and the AKL-South American connections, where NZ would serve as VA's South American Long Haul partner.
North America long haul as pointed out is already covered by AC and UA, with partial taxpayer subsidies from the Queensland Government thrown in for UA's QLD-USA flights.
If NZ is hoping they'll pick up VA's passengers for AUS-USA as part of a potentiual merger, chances are they'll be mostly low yielding VA passengers. Whilst filling up NZ's AKL-USA flights with low yielding VA pax may help with loads at the 'back of the bus', it won't help with long haul revenue on NZ's end.
Higher yielding leisure/FF VA pax is likely to pick up AC or UA for non-stop flights.
North America long haul as pointed out is already covered by AC and UA, with partial taxpayer subsidies from the Queensland Government thrown in for UA's QLD-USA flights.
If NZ is hoping they'll pick up VA's passengers for AUS-USA as part of a potentiual merger, chances are they'll be mostly low yielding VA passengers. Whilst filling up NZ's AKL-USA flights with low yielding VA pax may help with loads at the 'back of the bus', it won't help with long haul revenue on NZ's end.
Higher yielding leisure/FF VA pax is likely to pick up AC or UA for non-stop flights.