anat0l
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2006
- Posts
- 11,666
There's been a lot of talk around in the last year or so about Qantas's performance in terms of an airline of choice to fly, both domestically and internationally.
This forum has seen plenty of legitimate gripes, spits, disservice incidents and so on about the red roo. The big ones relate to domestic travel, Qantas's "sister" LCC Jetstar and Trans-Tasman/New Zealand services (or lack there of it).
With all of this going around, why fly Qantas?
Put another way, say someone from overseas has settled in the country and set up their own business. Part of their business may involve travelling around capital centres, perhaps some smaller ones. They have no predispositions to any airline and no loyalty program memberships. Who would you recommend to them, and why?
Let's go through some points:
I'll admit my reasons for flying QF are still that I believe - perhaps blindly - that the red roo are still a worthy airline to fly. 90%+ of the time, I get a good, clean seat and cabin, the crew are up to task and friendly. Also my status with QF and the oneworld benefits it brings would be difficult to go without or reproduce if I didn't fly QF domestically. I guess I should openly admit that I am a textbook case of loyalty-induced vendor lock-in.
But there are several out there that don't care for status or even points. Or lounges. Some just want transport from A to B in a cheap and efficient manner. Some might want the points but could never aspire for status; in which case I think Velocity was somewhat heralded (I think in the last 12-24 months) that it was a very good program for earn and burn.
It seems that the only people clinging to QF are those that "need" to fly it and nothing else. Pretty weak reasoning and one that could be very well shaken up by this recent tender by the Government.
QF has pretty much abandoned NZ (inter- and intra-) to a token effort.
More JQ routes are appearing on the radar rather than QF. And if people think DJ is better than QF than often they are also quick to point out that JQ is even worse than QF itself!
The QFF program has been enhanced in many unpleasant ways over the past few years. A big one that was discussed was the charging of exit row seats and the removal of premium status pax to preallocate them (free of charge).
So why is QF still mostly in the game when it seems out of touch with what constitutes a good airline?
Can it possibly be all unfair media beat-up? Surely they can't get it wrong all the time. And why then does it seem DJ hasn't made any mistakes. Nobody's perfect, right?
(And I don't think the fact that QF hasn't killed anyone is the answer)
Disclaimer: This thread is not having a go at everything non-QF or pro-QF
This forum has seen plenty of legitimate gripes, spits, disservice incidents and so on about the red roo. The big ones relate to domestic travel, Qantas's "sister" LCC Jetstar and Trans-Tasman/New Zealand services (or lack there of it).
With all of this going around, why fly Qantas?
Put another way, say someone from overseas has settled in the country and set up their own business. Part of their business may involve travelling around capital centres, perhaps some smaller ones. They have no predispositions to any airline and no loyalty program memberships. Who would you recommend to them, and why?
Let's go through some points:
- DJ has a better OTP than QF.
- With some savvy searching, DJ fares are cheaper than QF even with baggage and credit card charges. Sure, no food, but it appears people are starting to care much less. (People = others besides us who are on AFF).
- QF aircraft are older, are often in need of desperate maintenance and have varying degrees of cleanliness.
- QF lounges are always more crowded than DJ lounges.
- QF withdrew from NZ domestic to be replaced with JQ. They also are closing 3-4 lounges. Before that, QFNZ was still trumped by local flag flier NZ anyway - price, availability, OTP and service. Like some people said, the only reason for QFNZ was getting status with QF even on lowest fares.
- QFF is a stiff program for redemptions and is much less flexible after QF direct sweeping only was introduced.
- Long-haul service on QF is polarised - it can be excellent but it can also be ghastly terrible
- QF is a prize melon pick for the media.
- DJ has won a swag of gongs at the latest Skytrax awards; QF didn't even come away with a consolation prize. DJ just got Choice's tick of approval for best economy cabin, too.
I'll admit my reasons for flying QF are still that I believe - perhaps blindly - that the red roo are still a worthy airline to fly. 90%+ of the time, I get a good, clean seat and cabin, the crew are up to task and friendly. Also my status with QF and the oneworld benefits it brings would be difficult to go without or reproduce if I didn't fly QF domestically. I guess I should openly admit that I am a textbook case of loyalty-induced vendor lock-in.
But there are several out there that don't care for status or even points. Or lounges. Some just want transport from A to B in a cheap and efficient manner. Some might want the points but could never aspire for status; in which case I think Velocity was somewhat heralded (I think in the last 12-24 months) that it was a very good program for earn and burn.
It seems that the only people clinging to QF are those that "need" to fly it and nothing else. Pretty weak reasoning and one that could be very well shaken up by this recent tender by the Government.
QF has pretty much abandoned NZ (inter- and intra-) to a token effort.
More JQ routes are appearing on the radar rather than QF. And if people think DJ is better than QF than often they are also quick to point out that JQ is even worse than QF itself!
The QFF program has been enhanced in many unpleasant ways over the past few years. A big one that was discussed was the charging of exit row seats and the removal of premium status pax to preallocate them (free of charge).
So why is QF still mostly in the game when it seems out of touch with what constitutes a good airline?
Can it possibly be all unfair media beat-up? Surely they can't get it wrong all the time. And why then does it seem DJ hasn't made any mistakes. Nobody's perfect, right?
(And I don't think the fact that QF hasn't killed anyone is the answer)
Disclaimer: This thread is not having a go at everything non-QF or pro-QF
Last edited: