AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Interesting to also hear the critisism of lean, underripe, austere wines. The more common critisism I am used to is jammy, overextracted and alcoholic
Interesting to also hear the critisism of lean, underripe, austere wines. The more common critisism I am used to is jammy, overextracted and alcoholic
My personal tastes are the complete opposite of JO, but I understand where he is coming from in so far as HIS scoring system.
He is scoring a wine against his benchmark wines, wines that are agreed among critics as the ''best in it's field' and demonstrate the variety in its best form. At best it's a view that is very much skewed towards the old world and doesn't allow for anything that is maybe challenging the ideas of traditional winemaking.
As far as being independent, he's up there as one of the shining lights, he has no affiliation to anyone so he tells it like he sees it. I just find his method of scoring wines as something I'm not really interested in.
Agree that JO is as independent and honest as they get.
I think the way he scores is better than most. It’s ridiculous that any score below 90 by other critics means almost undrinkable these days.
I like his wines and buy them regularly but he uses corks of medium quality instead of screw caps. Not good for long term storage.not sure what you are referring to, is it in that article or just in general?
I thought he would of be in the same boat as James Halliday on screwcap.
I like his wines and buy them regularly but he uses corks of medium quality instead of screw caps. Not good for long term storage.
Very sad indeed.We’ve lost an absolute pioneer of the wine world today, so sad for his young family. Taras made some incredible minimal intervention wines and mixed commercial success with still sticking to his roots. Very sad news.
some Winemakers didn’t take this lightly because other critics score the same wine much higher, which leads to Ongoing problems, less wine will get reviewed by the lower score critics and more wine sents to higher score critics.
90 is not a bad score , I even drink wines that rated at 88 points, this high score marketing really kills the mood for winemakers and consumers.
I wonder who is to blame for trending inflated scoring in Australia, is it the older generation of critics such as JH and AC or the younger ones trying to shortcut their way to the top by making their scores more “attractive”?
That’s why I respect JO who is not afraid to score honestly, even if controversial at times. Can you imagine any of the young critics scoring By Farr flagship PN 85 points? They’ll be crucified! But JO doesn’t care, agree with him or not, he’s not taking part in a popularity contest.
We’ve lost an absolute pioneer of the wine world today, so sad for his young family. Taras made some incredible minimal intervention wines and mixed commercial success with still sticking to his roots. Very sad news.
Yes but why does he keep using corks?
I like his wines and buy them regularly but he uses corks of medium quality instead of screw caps. Not good for long term storage.
oh. My bad, I thought you were talking about Jeremy Oliver when you replied with my link with his article. I think josh cooper wines uses diam not cork,maybe some is under cork.
But I don’t prefer either. In the video JC did say why, it’s just his choice which he think it suits best with his style of wine.
Any Idea who the winemaker is he is referring to in the article? Mac Forbes possibly?
Probably telling everyone here how to suck eggs, but sometimes writing it out can help get your thoughts in order on a topic.
My personal tastes are the complete opposite of JO
The problem lies with the scoring system, it doesn’t differentiate between old and new world wines. Traditional French and new style Aussie PN can both score 99 points despite being completely different. To which benchmark should they be scored against? I don’t know.
thanks - my memory could be mistaken, but i thought that JO originally scored Cullen Diana Madeline 2018 88/89pts on the weekend - it's now 90pts, which is still a far cry from TWF's 97pts
Hi all,
Is there an existing thread on Selling expensive bottles of wine? ie. How, where and when.... commissions.....
I would like to know the process if I am in the position to sell a "considered" expensive bottle of wine that I may own.
he called what he saw even if it is a known brand so that’s a big plus , but the downside is he hardly revisit the same wine again.
I don’t really follow JO scores but did he rated other CM vintages around 90 as well?
JO | TWF | |
2018 | 90 | 97 |
2014 | 95 | 97 |
2013 | 90 | 96 |
2012 | 88 | 97 |
2011 | 92 | 92+/96+ |
2010 | 97 | 94+ |
2009 | 98 | 94+ |
2007 | 89 | 94/95+ |
2006 | 87 | 91 |
2005 | 97 | 95/95+ |
2004 | 97 | 93 |
2003 | 95 | 93 |
2002 | 90/95 | 88 |
2001 | 97 | 96 |
2000 | 97 | 93 |
1999 | 97 | - |
1998 | 96 | - |
1997 | 93 | - |
1996 | 95 | 90+ |
JO TWF 2018 90 97 2014 95 97 2013 90 96 2012 88 97 2011 92 92+/96+ 2010 97 94+ 2009 98 94+ 2007 89 94/95+ 2006 87 91 2005 97 95/95+ 2004 97 93 2003 95 93 2002 90/95 88 2001 97 96 2000 97 93 1999 97 - 1998 96 - 1997 93 - 1996 95 90+
also for those who missed his 2016 Wine Annual, I've just uploaded it here