With respect to Carry-On limits, why are Garment bags so special?

SeatBackForward

Established Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2006
Posts
4,960
Qantas
LT Gold
Oneworld
Emerald
A recent article over on the other website about QF baggage allowances got me thinking

Why are garment bags so special to warrant their own additional carry-on allowance

Do they strictly have to be the loose full cover type? or what if I have a tri-fold garment bag that's not rigid? In which case, why isn't a duffel bag with only clothes passable as a "garment bag"?

To be fair, not many travelers use these anyhow, but I'm just wondering why it's a special exclusion with no guidance on what it means, whereas "personal item" seems to be more restrictive.
 
The Frequent Flyer Concierge team takes the hard work out of finding reward seat availability. Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, they'll help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

I didn't think they were additional, it was more that they would allow a non-rigid garment bag that was outside the dimensions that are normally used.
Qantas Domestic + International
1664520646532.png

Virgin Domestic + International
1664520700386.png

An additional item but will contribute to the total weight allowance.
 
It's a choice on Qantas. I still think it's primarily due to the outsize nature of the garment bag.
View attachment 298677
I just find it odd that they don't specify more detail of what counts as a Garment bag. I mean I have one of these, that for all intents is a garment bag, would it count as a garment bag, or is it considered as "rigid" ?

32301601-2.jpg
 
I think it's intended to be a 'suit bag' or wedding dress bag.

But certainly see a lot of people (including myself) using a well packed tri-fold bah
Is your tri-fold bag in addition to another carry on item?
 
Back
Top