Yeti Airlines Crash

Status
Not open for further replies.
One of the consequences with feathering is the engine torque will also reduce to prevent the engine over torque due to reduced propellor load from the feathering. How long would it have taken for engine torque to increase if feathering was corrected? I can't imagine it would be instant
I can’t say how long but yes it definitely would have taken some time to come out of feather and spool up again. It is definitely not instant.
 
Elevate your business spending to first-class rewards! Sign up today with code AFF10 and process over $10,000 in business expenses within your first 30 days to unlock 10,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.
Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:

✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!
- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

I can’t say how long but yes it definitely would have taken some time to come out of feather and spool up again. It is definitely not instant.
There was a gap of about 30 seconds between the time the condition levers were selected (instead of flap) and the time where the flaps were actually taken to 30. I'm sure it would have seemed like hours waiting to the props to provide power, but you'd have to expect it would only a few seconds. Any power at all would have delayed things... I guess we'll eventually find out.

This does continue to fit in with a theory that I think I wrote about a year or two ago. Protection, whether it be training, or hardware and software, has taken away the causes of many historic accidents. So, now, we're left with the outliers. Events that we look at and just wonder how it was done.
 
This does continue to fit in with a theory that I think I wrote about a year or two ago. Protection, whether it be training, or hardware and software, has taken away the causes of many historic accidents. So, now, we're left with the outliers. Events that we look at and just wonder how it was done.
This is looking more and more like you previously indicated ... questioning how much recent time the (instructing) Captain (originally Pilot Monitoring) had operating in the right seat. Normally operating as a captain (in left seat) he would be using his right hand to manipulate the flaps control, but in this situation and in an unusual position he was using his left hand, so perhaps the "muscle memory" didn't kick in to identify the mistake?
 
@jb747 what do you think about the final stages of the flight in which the aircraft was stalled. Would it have been better to nose down to stay in control. still a likely bad outcome but better than freefalling in to the ground.
 
@jb747 what do you think about the final stages of the flight in which the aircraft was stalled. Would it have been better to nose down to stay in control. still a likely bad outcome but better than freefalling in to the ground.
You're always going to be better off if you arrive at the ground under some semblance of control. Missing that ravine might have helped too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top