Why couldn't QF cut back everyday flights from Per-Sin to say 3 times a week at least the planes should be full!
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
738 has a max range of 3115 nautical miles, so should not be a problem for PER-SIN, if they really wanted to do it.Doubt the 738 reaches SIN economically (it is 2433miles) (versus SYD-PER at 2038 miles) - although I note FJ has used it on services over 3000miles.. The Perth fliers would then complain about not having proper Business seats..
Think the real issue in PER would be the lack of Business Class paying travellers, and poor yields given all of the LCCs that compete on the SE Asian routes.
Doubt the 738 reaches SIN economically (it is 2433miles) (versus SYD-PER at 2038 miles) - although I note FJ has used it on services over 3000miles.. The Perth fliers would then complain about not having proper Business seats..
Think the real issue in PER would be the lack of Business Class paying travellers, and poor yields given all of the LCCs that compete on the SE Asian routes.
I flew per-sing last Friday and not many empty seats,fly home on to on tonight's flight, should be interesting.
Per-Sin is the fourth busiest route for international passenger traffic in Australia, not sure what dropping it says about Qantas!
The 738 was built to specifications from a major USA carrier to meet USA trans-continental routes of greater than 2500 mile (2200nm) range. So PER-SIN is certainly within economical range for a 738.738 has a max range of 3115 nautical miles, so should not be a problem for PER-SIN, if they really wanted to do it.
I think Lesley should run the whole show.
A smart and intelligent person with a strong understanding of what it is to be customer focused. ..........but what would I know