One would hope so. Maybe I was being a bit too cynical there. However a manual review of approved fly forwards would not be very surprising.Oh my, that is awful then. Surely they have better things to do!
One would hope so. Maybe I was being a bit too cynical there. However a manual review of approved fly forwards would not be very surprising.Oh my, that is awful then. Surely they have better things to do!
Super early Monday morning request by a young DYKWIA, denied and then go to check in, denied again. Im wondering if the CS staff made a point to monitor the pax booking and got peeved the OP got around her. But thats me guessing.One would hope so. Maybe I was being a bit too cynical there. However a manual review of approved fly forwards would not be very surprising.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
I agree with DrRon's comments above this above. And AJ will never see the letter. Pulling the boarding pass once it had been issued is reprehensible. QF may or may not read AFF even thought it's Google indexed. But put it on Facebook or Twitter and it is another matter. Then it becomes a definite negative PR for QF (that's even if they care.)The first 2 staff were doing their job but as always here on AFF(and other FF forums)the advice is always ask a different agent.
The third staff member was one of those treasures.I have experienced that on one occasion as well where if the agent went by the letter of the law I would have spent another night away from home.Fortunately my new BP wasn't recalled.
So really your complaint should be about your BP being cancelled and I would have left out the bit of the first 2 agents.To take that BP off you was cruel and reflects badly on QF.
But now nothing will happen.you may get a generic response in 4-6 weeks but maybe not.
And it is likely Alan will never see that correspondence.
What is it about airlines that so many people expect "leniency" and "bending the rules"??????
It seems almost every time I go through an airport, there is someone at some point (check-in, lounge, whatever) asking/arguing/begging/chucking hissy fit because they want a service/product that is listed to cost more, but without paying more than what they did.
But I do not see people in the supermarket telling the check-out girl that they have been "loyal Woolies ambassadors" and thus want a discount from their bill, I do not see people explaining to the guy at the servo that they have suffered calamity XYZ and can they please get free fuel.
If you only concentrate on the fact that a boarding pass was retracted, this is rare and severe. But I suspect there was more to this. I think Denali's post is right on the mark........
Then come a little further down the coast.I have seen little old ladies try to get freebies at Woollies.But they are only the loose lettuce leaves surely you cant charge me for those-except I had witnessed her tearing the outer leaves off several lettuce.What is it about airlines that so many people expect "leniency" and "bending the rules"??????
It seems almost every time I go through an airport, there is someone at some point (check-in, lounge, whatever) asking/arguing/begging/chucking hissy fit because they want a service/product that is listed to cost more, but without paying more than what they did.
But I do not see people in the supermarket telling the check-out girl that they have been "loyal Woolies ambassadors" and thus want a discount from their bill, I do not see people explaining to the guy at the servo that they have suffered calamity XYZ and can they please get free fuel.
If you only concentrate on the fact that a boarding pass was retracted, this is rare and severe. But I suspect there was more to this. I think Denali's post is right on the mark........
.... And AJ will never see the letter.....
What is it about airlines that so many people expect "leniency" and "bending the rules"??????
But to snatch the boarding pass back after it was given, to an apparently long term, frequent and loyal customer...that's a whole different story.
Well, they do downgrade J passengers to Y when a flight is cancelled and they are desperate for space. It’s not much different to that I guess.if QF are sticklers for the rules, what rule is it that they snatch the BP back? What rule is that?
This is a Qantas management problem, not the various counter staff. As posted above, a service industry can empower their staff to make common sense decisions rather than sticking to the "black and white" rules. After all, we know Qantas breaks their own rules when it suits them.
There was a post on a Virgin thread recently here the Virgin agent did something that "broke the rules" but made the poster's day, IIRC.
Focussing here on the OP's writing style, and who they wrote to doesn't detract from the essence of the experience, and what happened to them. We hear of this time and time and time again - not just Qantas of course, but that doesn't excuse it; there was that case that got a lot of airtime on AFF last year (forget name, sorry). Right now, think of their TV ads - got the music and images in your head? Now think of this and other similar experiences about Qantas' treatment of their customers - "loyal" or not - we've heard on AFF. Right.
Well, they do downgrade J passengers to Y when a flight is cancelled and they are desperate for space. It’s not much different to that I guess.
I don’t think anyone here other than OP perhaps, had issues with the demand for payment with flight change. It is the retraction of the new BP that rankles and that is what I’d tweet if I wasn’t able to move on.
Given my profound loyalty, my expectation is that when the tables turn and life circumstances impact my life to a point where Qantas could possibly accommodate me if possible, then I would be appreciative and further encourage me to carry on being the ambassador to Qantas that I have become to be.
>
astrokid is a WP not a P1 according to the first post in the thread. For those of us who are WP and would find P1 difficult/impossible to reach it would've been nice if WP was still the top tier. Perhaps then some leniency would be extended that's now more likely to only be shown to P1 (if at all).