While there's still a while to go in terms of the investigations and findings, I can't help but think that the mass sacking of air traffic controllers in 1981 has had some serious knock-on effects over the years, including doing it "their way".There will be a lot of the “frog in boiling water” about this. There are procedures at play here (and right across the USA) that are just plain dumb, and which are not seen anywhere else in the world. But, because they’ve gotten away with it for so long, they’ve come to be seen as safe, when they’re the exact opposite. I’m sure it’s been said at some point in the pilot thread, but I found US ATC and their procedures to be the worst that I ever had to deal with. Controllers that speak at a million miles per hour, use phrases that are non standard (even for them), get snarky if you have any issues with them (from asking for a “say again”, to being unable to comply) and who will respond with clearances that are nothing short of punishments.
Aviation safety has had a long held foundation of investigations focused on lessons not blame. At the end of the day blame is negative in nature, but great clickbait to the keyboard warriors.
Remember that it's not only the Americans who may be guilty of this. NIH is a world-wide issue.American exceptionalism writ large...
And with Trump getting rid of anyone they claim is 'DEI', FAA staffing will get worse
There is an acting FAA administrator - someone who has been at the FAA for 20 yearsThere is also no FAA administrator at the moment.
First rule of Crash investigation - to not find or apportion blame. Safety does not improve with a blame culture.It's nice that the headlines (inc this thread title) are trying to blame the PSA flight when it was the army helo not meant to be there.
Yep - they are a strange lot. I've seen things in other industries there that are plain dumb - but they do them because it is more convenient than avoiding doing what the rest of the world wouldn't do. There is a certain gung-ho culture present there to.There will be a lot of the “frog in boiling water” about this. There are procedures at play here (and right across the USA) that are just plain dumb, and which are not seen anywhere else in the world. But, because they’ve gotten away with it for so long, they’ve come to be seen as safe, when they’re the exact opposite. I’m sure it’s been said at some point in the pilot thread, but I found US ATC and their procedures to be the worst that I ever had to deal with. Controllers that speak at a million miles per hour, use phrases that are non standard (even for them), get snarky if you have any issues with them (from asking for a “say again”, to being unable to comply) and who will respond with clearances that are nothing short of punishments.
OK this is interesting - take a look at this video - and particularly pay attention to the bit about heights for the helicopter - and then look at the last minute of the video which shows that the
helicopter has popped up to 350 feet -View attachment 429670
And, as reported by the ABC: Asked how he could conclude diversity had something to do with the crash, he said: "Because I have common sense."And with Trump getting rid of anyone they claim is 'DEI', FAA staffing will get worse
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
I wasn't aware that it had been reported yesterday that the helicopter was above its required maximum height, but like you said - relying on 150ft / 45 metres of vertical separation underneath a jet that is descending on final into land is relying on too little - we've seen plenty of reports of RPT jets descending below minimums or below the glide slope on final - and clearly helicopters can pop up above their allowed height of 200 feet too - planning for just 45 metres of vertical separation if everyone is flying at their allocated height is beyond stupid.Yes that was reported yesterday. Not exactly a smoking gun but yet another hole in the cheese. I wouldn’t be relying on 150FT of vertical separation. The requirement to be visual with aircraft on final is the main thing.
“Just the facts, Ma'am.”
Too much conjecture here.
They are saying (or at least it is reported as such) a prelim in 30 days.No comment here until the final NTSB report is in (say, 2 years).
At least the investigators should have a full set of black box info for their investigation, although I don't know whether army blackhawks have coughpit voice recorders etc.
30 days is an ICAO requirementThey are saying (or at least it is reported as such) a prelim in 30 days.
Yes, and we AFFers have all of the answers. . Some more than others it seems. Just the facts, ma’am.Note to AFFers. No comment here until the final NTSB report is in (say, 2 years). Then the facts will be known.