ACCC pressures Virgin to lift travel credit expiry [update - Virgin forced to extend]

VA no longer fly international long haul and by the looks aren’t likely to anytime soon. So there’s really no excuse for not refunding money they can’t or won’t offer a service for.
Do note the VA that took the pensioner's money and formed a contract with no longer exist - the current VA that you're referring to do not hold the $15k the pensioner paid. Presumably they're also not booking on the UA codeshare due to the costs involved.

Regrettable and unfortunate but c'est la vie.
 
Do note the VA that took the pensioner's money and formed a contract with no longer exist - the current VA that you're referring to do not hold the $15k the pensioner paid. Presumably they're also not booking on the UA codeshare due to the costs involved.

Regrettable and unfortunate but c'est la vie.
Those debts were on the books that Bain paid for so no, not really. They possibly could have tried to write off those credits - but they didn’t.

No doubt Bain are calling the shots on the “no refund” and credit expiry policy in the hope of an IPO (that’s really unlikely to happen any time soon also).
 
Those debts were on the books that Bain paid for so no, not really. They possibly could have tried to write off those credits - but they didn’t.

No doubt Bain are calling the shots on the “no refund” and credit expiry policy in the hope of an IPO (that’s really unlikely to happen any time soon also).
The courts and majority of the creditors agreed on providing the credits as part of the sale to Bain.
The pensioner would've agreed to the terms when those credits were issued and accepted.
If the pensioner wanted her money back - she could've done a chargeback or attempting to recover the funds as an unsecured creditor.
 
VA no longer fly international long haul and by the looks aren’t likely to anytime soon. So there’s really no excuse for not refunding money they can’t or won’t offer a service for.
Except she bought the tickets before Virgin went into administration which in effect clears the debt and deck to restart.

However, if I was Virgin I would have had it sorted on Delta as soon as the ABC phoned for an interview about it, then by the time the story hit the airwaves it's a non event.
Post automatically merged:

The courts and majority of the creditors agreed on providing the credits as part of the sale to Bain.
The pensioner would've agreed to the terms when those credits were issued and accepted.
If the pensioner wanted her money back - she could've done a chargeback or attempting to recover the funds as an unsecured creditor.

Did you see the interview, I'm sure she would have been across all that....not.
 
Do note the VA that took the pensioner's money and formed a contract with no longer exist - the current VA that you're referring to do not hold the $15k the pensioner paid. Presumably they're also not booking on the UA codeshare due to the costs involved.

Regrettable and unfortunate but c'est la vie.

But they gave her a credit to use, so the 'money' was still available to her.
 
The courts and majority of the creditors agreed on providing the credits as part of the sale to Bain.
The pensioner would've agreed to the terms when those credits were issued and accepted.
If the pensioner wanted her money back - she could've done a chargeback or attempting to recover the funds as an unsecured creditor.
As an unsecured creditor she wouldn’t have received anything like the $ value of her booking even if that was successful.

I wonder how many people have actually successfully used these credits to book?
It seems that VA only has a certain amount of seats on different flights where they can be used.
From this article
1 news NZ

IMG_6970.jpeg
 
Except you can’t use it on codeshare flights (with a VA code). Another level of detail that would have been clear as mud to the lay person. Really poor form TBH.
Agree and did Bain tell her that weren't planning to fly to LAX, of course not.
Don't disagree - but simply asking for a refund since 'service not provided' from an effectively different entity is not agreeable here.
 
As an unsecured creditor she wouldn’t have received anything like the $ value of her booking even if that was successful.

I wonder how many people have actually successfully used these credits to book?
It seems that VA only has a certain amount of seats on different flights where they can be used.
From this article
1 news NZ

View attachment 352239
I've used them. As recently as this week. It's a little restrictive but not excessive IME and the fares were not inflated relative to what was available without redeeming a future flight credit. ZQN and the pacific destinations probably are difficult but you can understand why. They're obviously the most popular.

I'm not minimising the harm this has caused the pensioner but at the end of the day, the business did sadly go broke. I count myself very fortunate that Velocity points didn't go with it.
 
Don't disagree - but simply asking for a refund since 'service not provided' from an effectively different entity is not agreeable here.

Of course Virgin can agree, they just have to make the choice on compassionate grounds.

The business I manage we make choices all the time outside the black and white terms and conditions, if the customer puts up a case and we view from both sides we make the decision that we hope is the best for everyone involved.
 
Don't disagree - but simply asking for a refund since 'service not provided' from an effectively different entity is not agreeable here.

OF course it is, this is what separates customer service from just a airline to a great airline.
 
Of course Virgin can agree, they just have to make the choice on compassionate grounds.

The business I manage we make choices all the time outside the black and white terms and conditions, if the customer puts up a case and we view from both sides we make the decision that we hope is the best for everyone involved.
I do the same for my customers. Actually, I do it on a pretty regular basis. The difference, as I see it, is that this lady, as unfortunate as the circumstances are, was NOT a customer of their business. Never was.

Maybe you, in your business, would make an ex gratia offer to someone who has never been a customer and never will be, but, as a business owner, it's not a decision I would make.
 
Of course Virgin can agree, they just have to make the choice on compassionate grounds.
No they absolutely cannot. The company went into administration and an administration process is very legally in depth which in the case of Virgin Australia was purchased by Bain Capital in principle under a DOCA (Deed Of Company Arrangement).
In the purchase of the company would include lots of stipulations etc. which have gone through the court system.
The administration process is one which allows company's to terminate contracts without full liability and also legally doesn't have to pay any creditor 100% of it funds back if they can't be recovered.

The Future Flight Credits are interesting. As part of the DOCA these were included, and subsequently they have been extended though there was no legal requirement to do so (nor did the ACCC ask them to do so).

How these FFC's sit on Virgin Australia's balance sheet would be interesting. They are not a source of income as the company during or post administration never received any income. However, in turn the full balance of them most likely is not on the company's liabilities as it is technically leveraging the costs by releasing certain amounts per flight. Though of course when flown the airline has to pay the relevant airport fees, it can probably dodge around the GST element though this must be a liability of some sorts.

Those who think that Virgin Australia will make a financial gain from unused FFC's are really misleading. If you receive no money and provide a service for no cost, you have lost money. The company currently trading as Virgin Australia did not receive your money.

I appreciate most people don't understand the legal in or outs of company administration, but really it's probably best not to comment on what you think a company can or can't do unless you are going to take your comments to court or the ACCC in which you would be dismissed by both.

 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

I do the same for my customers. Actually, I do it on a pretty regular basis. The difference, as I see it, is that this lady, as unfortunate as the circumstances are, was NOT a customer of their business. Never was.

Maybe you, in your business, would make an ex gratia offer to someone who has never been a customer and never will be, but, as a business owner, it's not a decision I would make.
Yes but if you keep the same name you want to keep the goodwill.
Post automatically merged:

No they absolutely cannot. The company went into administration and an administration process is very legally in depth which in the case of Virgin Australia was purchased by Bain Capital in principle under a DOCA (Deed Of Company Arrangement).
In the purchase of the company would include lots of stipulations etc. which have gone through the court system.
The administration process is one which allows company's to terminate contracts without full liability and also legally doesn't have to pay any creditor 100% of it funds back if they can't be recovered.

The Future Flight Credits are interesting. As part of the DOCA these were included, and subsequently they have been extended though there was no legal requirement to do so (nor did the ACCC ask them to do so).

How these FFC's sit on Virgin Australia's balance sheet would be interesting. They are not a source of income as the company during or post administration never received any income. However, in turn the full balance of them most likely is not on the company's liabilities as it is technically leveraging the costs by releasing certain amounts per flight. Though of course when flown the airline has to pay the relevant airport fees, it can probably dodge around the GST element though this must be a liability of some sorts.

Those who think that Virgin Australia will make a financial gain from unused FFC's are really misleading. If you receive no money and provide a service for no cost, you have lost money. The company currently trading as Virgin Australia did not receive your money.

I appreciate most people don't understand the legal in or outs of company administration, but really it's probably best not to comment on what you think a company can or can't do unless you are going to take your comments to court or the ACCC in which you would be dismissed by both.


But they gave her a credit to use later.
 
But they gave her a credit to use later.
Correct a credit which always had an expiry date.
Gift cards are a term of credit and normally have an expiry use by.
The credit could have been used in full by a friend / family member etc.

Though feel free to go to the ACCC, they have already confirmed they have no issues with the FFC's expiring.

Also for added clarify, it was Deliotte the administrator who came up with the FFC's instead of all customers being unsecured creditors. This was the goodwill to customers.

If Virgin Australia did provide a refund, they would likely legally breach their DOCA and some stuff under the corporations act. They could be legally in trouble.
 
Last edited:
Yes but if you keep the same name you want to keep the goodwill.
I agree. But that goodwill is valued. The price they paid for that goodwill doesn't justify offering a blank cheque for anyone who was hard done by from the collapse of the previous business.
 
I agree. But that goodwill is valued. The price they paid for that goodwill doesn't justify offering a blank cheque for anyone who was hard done by from the collapse of the previous business.
Correct! And for everything else, there's gofundme. Oh, oops Mastercard ;-)
 
At the end of the day, creditors voted in favour of the credit only on VA metal route. The other option was 10c maximum per dollar. The courts approved it.

It’s against the law for VA to go against this and issue refunds. Becomes a legal minefield the moment they issue one creditor a refund.

Sure it’s not morally right, but the consequences are quite considerable for the business should one creditor be refunded.

(By the way, you really think Bain give a flying rats about this lady?)
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top