AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Nothing within the VA Virtual Network direct - HKG/LHR.... You'd have to fly either CX or QF, both OW
If anything, VA will first start flying SIN direct on there own metal to connect with SQ hub, which is a rumour that's been on & off for months... Could a A332 even do SYD-HKG?
Nothing within the VA Virtual Network direct - HKG/LHR.... You'd have to fly either CX or QF, both OW
If anything, VA will first start flying SIN direct on there own metal to connect with SQ hub, which is a rumour that's been on & off for months... Could a A332 even do SYD-HKG?
Considering QF have run their 333's to HKG from MEL, PER, SYD and BNE, the 332 won't have any issues as it has more legs.
A lot of people who go to London (or where ever) do not care (or even know) what the transit city is. If VS could not make it pay unlikely VA can. For HKG as a destination there competing airlines now. There a lot of airlines from Australia to London via SIN, HKG, various Chinese cities and Middle East cities. Remember here on AFF we are in the 5% who even notice such thingsWith recent announcement of Virgin Atlantic dropping HKG - SYD, will VA be the one to offer services to HKG ? Else, what is the alternative to have people fly to London via HKG ?
For selfish reasons I would prefer to see VA fly direct to PVG rather than HKG (our son lives in Shanghai) or VA setup code share arrangements with China Eastern.
I believe QF already has this wrapped up!
If VS couldnt make money on the route, are we thinking that VA may have a lower cost base to make it profitable?
Well an a332 will have a lower operating cost than the a346 VS are using.
VA Metal Aust to any other Asian port other than Denpasar ... odds ?