Probably more of a business decision.… QF seems to hate ADL
Probably more of a business decision.… QF seems to hate ADL
Who knows, with these upcoming A321s, maybe QF will try ADL-AKL. They've said they're prepared to try PER-AKL. I think that if they try for both then it may well be only seasonal, or a few times a week.Its a small thing, but QF seems to hate ADL
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
I'd have to say, IMO, that may one of the reasons why VA only decided to approach NZ as a unilateral partner initially (ala acting as the glorified Travel Agent) to provide Trans-Tasman services to the main 3 NZ cities by re-selling NZ seats, without spending the CapEx (or OpEx) to operate their own metal, or even putting in the expenditure towards operating the old Joint-Venture (JV) partnership pre-COVID/breakup.Air NZ have been really struggling with their fleet and it shows unlucky decisions with the 787s and A320s have meant they’ve taken delivery of aircraft and then instantly parked it in Auckland taken the engine off and used it on a different aircraft. Obviously this isn’t their fault as the engine manufacturers told them how many cycles an inspection would be required and it’s turned out to be a lot less however they now don’t have the aircraft to operate a competitive trans Tasman and pacific schedule which is why we’re seating old CX 777s being bought into help.
I'd have to say, IMO, that may one of the reasons why VA only decided to approach NZ as a unilateral partner initially (ala acting as the glorified Travel Agent) to provide Trans-Tasman services to the main 3 NZ cities by re-selling NZ seats, without spending the CapEx (or OpEx) to operate their own metal, or even putting in the expenditure towards operating the old Joint-Venture (JV) partnership pre-COVID/breakup.
Actually wasn't aware of that so that's useful information