- Joined
- May 25, 2013
- Posts
- 1,754
Yes, they have moved the goalposts. And so they should!I don't understand how is it possible that this many people (including hutch here) miss my point... Which is - Qantas have changed the game/moved the goal posts, drastically in their favour.
I know they want to sell the seats for cash (duh!) - I am saying they are not playing fair.
They are in the business of maximising revenue. In that, they seek the optimum mix of income. If they can fill the planes (max out the yield) with cash fares, naturally they'd do that. It has recently meant that they reserve all seats on popular routes / times to cash only (with a sprinkling of upgrade rewards).
When airlines sell seats, they sell perishable goods. There's zero opportunity for revenue after the gate has closed. This has led me to treat the reward flights similar to half-price last-day products at the supermarket: don't expect to get any but if there's a pack of what you intended to buy anyway (give or take some flexibility you are OK with), of course you'd consider that as an option. But I don't go in expecting to feed myself with half-price items. As many have mentioned, a high degree of flexibility is the key these days if you want to obtain reward flights. I rarely have or want to exercise that luxury in my travels which means more $$$$ to the airlines.
But back to your question: what would you consider 'fair' in this context? Fair to whom?