amaroo
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2011
- Posts
- 12,359
- Qantas
- Platinum 1
In your opinion. I, in the other hand, do not call AFF members dishonest.
A dishonest act/transaction isn't reduced because you're a member of an Internet forum.
In your opinion. I, in the other hand, do not call AFF members dishonest.
And once again, overpayment of tax is not illegal, indeed the tax laws specifically allow it. I realise you think this is not legitimate but tax law doesn't.
Deliberate over payment to gain financial benefit is very different to an honest calculation error.
I'm not sure how paying a c/c surcharge is considered to be a financial benefit. If anything it's a financial loss. Sure, the points you get from it are a benefit .. but it's not financial.
Sorry, but do you have a reason to send money to the tax department other than because tax law requires it?I'm enormously confused now. How does paying the ATO more tax and getting a refund have much to do with tax law at all?
Checked today - a tax bill of ~$500 via the standard AMEX Velocity Escape card has earned 1 pt per $1, which I'm very happy with, given that there's no annual fee
Checked today - a tax bill of ~$500 via the standard AMEX Velocity Escape card has earned 1 pt per $1, which I'm very happy with, given that there's no annual fee
I find it more interesting than it wasn't 0.5ppd. No?
Personally I agree with you but tax disputes are handled under the law (I'm 100% confident if this was ever before the court they would adjudicate on this based on the law rather than either of our opinions), perhaps to demonstrate your opinion you can point to where the law differentiates these.Deliberate over payment to gain financial benefit is very different to an honest calculation error.
I find it more interesting than it wasn't 0.5ppd. No?
Depending on the extent of your spending, you might find the annual fee for a Westpac Altitude Black (for example) is more than justified.
With the Velocity Escape it's costing you 1.45c per pt when you pay ATO bills (ignoring tax deduction if applicable). If you're happy paying that, presumably you'd be happy if the cost of the additional points that come with Altitude Black also cost 1.45c?
If you paid the full annual fee of $395, and spent a total of $56k per year on Amex, you'd earn 28,000 more points with Altitude Black compared to Velocity Escape. That's an incremental cost of 1.4c per pt. Just to stress that this refers to total annual spend of $56k, not just ATO bills. If you spend more than that, obviously the incremental cost of the additional points comes down - eg 0.8c per pt with an annual spend of $100k.
Perhaps more importantly, your total points haul would be 50% higher. There are some other benefits of Altitude Black too, plus as far as I can tell few people pay the full fee (I pay $195).
Personally I agree with you but tax disputes are handled under the law (I'm 100% confident if this was ever before the court they would adjudicate on this based on the law rather than either of our opinions), perhaps to demonstrate your opinion you can point to where the law differentiates these.
I'd agree that is possible but all indications are in fact that the ATO are very happy with cards as a payment method, they've in fact moved it to one of the "preferred" methods of payment.No need for a court to get involved. If they get swamped with deliberate over payment "gaming" all they need to do is amend their payment methods.
Thanks for the tip; I'll certainly look into it, although I'm also saving QFF points for a major trip once my long-service leave kicks in, so my spend is spread around between various cards.
I'm fairly certain that my Velocity points will be used for a SYD-LAX return in J for a scuba-diving trip; this costs around $5600 for a pair of random dates later in 2014. Alternatively, it would cost 94,000 points each way (plus a small payment) - at 1.45c / pt, that works out at $2700-ish, which at half-price isn't too bad (in my personal book). In practice, of course, most of my Amex usage is for everyday spend without a credit card surcharge (so the points are effectively free), and paying the occasional surcharge which (at worst) results in my J flight being about half the cash price works for me. I'm sure others may disagree, and any additional suggestions to go with the feedback on Altitude Black would be appreciated if I'm being fundamentally inefficient / insufficiently cunning
You're absolutely right, getting a J fare half price is not bad at all. However, I think you can do better!
You're also correct that points in most cases with the Velocity Escape card are free, but I had already factored that in to my calculations above. That's why I referred to the incremental cost for the additional 0.5 pts per $ that you get with Altitude Black, rather than the cost based on the total earn of 1.5 pts per $.
To look at it another way, based on the cost per point earned overall: if you take an annual spend of $94k as an example (the amount you'd have to spend on Velocity Escape to get 94,000 points for a J reward to LA), you'd earn 141,000 points with Altitude Black, at an overall cost of just 0.28c per point (excluding surcharges, but the surcharges would be the same with either card). Would you pay $395 for an extra 47,000 points? I know I would - since as you have illustrated yourself, that's equivalent to half a J trip to LA, which is worth $2,800! But as I said at the start, it depends on your spending level - obviously if it takes you 2 years to spend $94k, then the cost doubles, and so on.
No, the Select (Citirewards version) DOES NOT still give points on ATO spend. I have no idea about the QF version though.From someone who knows, one way the card companies could shut this down is by saying no points on ATO payments, just as Citibank did on MOST of their cards ( but not Citiselect)