4 dropped catches and a missed run out? This match does not mean much.
The key is 3/28 in first innings and 3/37 in second innings against pop gun attack. The Duke ball swings fiercely in England. Both Smith and Warner back? Who are the other 4?
Just got home to see Khawaja get his century and the declaration 3/196. He ends with 101 n.o. And Head 59 n.o. - great for their averages, particularly Khawaja as not often they get not outs.
SL need 516. Cant see that happening
Sure, the runs and wickets mean nothing, that is unless you score none and get very little4 dropped catches and a missed run out? This match does not mean much.
The key is 3/28 in first innings and 3/37 in second innings against pop gun attack. The Duke ball swings fiercely in England. Both Smith and Warner back? Who are the other 4?
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
They dropped 4 and a few of them very costly including Patterson first ball. Plus they've got injuries. I'm worried about the ones who have failed to score.Wait what we dropped 4?
Indeed. The SL team is one of the least talented teams to tour. We are getting ahead of ourselves if we use that as a benchmark. Add to that the weirdness of the cricket selections and it’s a different ball game.I wouldn't underestimate England at home - if I still was an Australian Cricket supporter I wouldn't be betting money on Australia in the Ashes even though I'd love them to win
I would doubt any Australian cricket fan is using this SL series as a benchmark (if they are then there's something wrong up top), but you can't just completely disregard player performances because SL aren't the juggernaut of a side India are.Indeed. The SL team is one of the least talented teams to tour. We are getting ahead of ourselves if we use that as a benchmark. Add to that the weirdness of the cricket selections and it’s a different ball game.
cricinfo said:8.1
Wicket
Starc to FDM Karunaratne, OUT, through him! There's the first of the day...a lovely delivery, just short of a length, nips back off the seam, beats Karunaratne's forward push and just skims the leg stump. In fact, just clipped the leg bail. Both bowlers getting the ball to tail back today
FDM Karunaratne b Starc 8 (21b 2x4 0x6) SR: 38.09
12.6
W
Starc to Chandimal, OUT, edged, just carries to third slip! That's a sharp, low grab by Labuschagne. Chandimal is standing his ground so this will go upstairs. Soft signal is out. Back of a length at off stump, he's squared up, and that appears to have gone straight in. Fingers under the ball
LD Chandimal c Labuschagne b Starc 4 (9b 0x4 0x6) SR: 44.44
22.4
Wicket
coughmins to Thirimanne, OUT, caught and bowled! Sensational athleticism from coughmins!This was a quick short ball, gets some extra bounce that gets big on Thirimanne, he tries to fend from in front of his face, it pops up off the splice of the bat, it ballooned back down the wicket, coughmins sprinted forward and to his left from his follow through, dives forward and takes the catch inches above the turf.
HDRL Thirimanne c & b coughmins 30 (81b 2x4 0x6) SR: 37.03
28.2
Wicket
Starc to Dickwella, OUT, Bowled him!147kph and it shot a touch low as he played from the crease! It was a fuller length, he stayed back, caught on the crease, it skidded lower, shot under the bat as he was squared up defending and crashed into off stump!
N Dickwella b Starc 27 (42b 3x4 0x6) SR: 64.28
28.3
Wicket
Starc to MDKJ Perera, OUT, Caught behind! Inside edge! The double bluff! He was sitting back expecting a short ball, it was full outside off and tailing back a touch, he drives without any footwork, gets a thin inside edge and Paine moves forward to his right and takes a good catch just above the ground
MDKJ Perera c †Paine b Starc 0 (1b 0x4 0x6) SR: 0.00
I would doubt any Australian cricket fan is using this SL series as a benchmark (if they are then there's something wrong up top), but you can't just completely disregard player performances because SL aren't the juggernaut of a side India are.
If you're going to judge people for not performing against this side, then conversely you have to give weight to the runs and wickets people put on the board as well. I've seen so many people dismiss any performance in this series 'because it's SL', so on that argument why would we give weight to Shield performances when a lot of those matches played would be of even lesser quality?