Different situation and entirely consistent with my point. When its a community case (as that quote related to) processing those results should always be give top priority and in NSW they are.
Only 36 cases to be sequenced in total in that entire period. On average 2 cases in total per day Why would top priority even be a factor?
I could ask why you think several days for genomic testing for a community cases who travelled widely was ok,
You could, but as I have never stated that it is a an irrelevant question to ask.
Though sequencing does sometimes take more than a day. Quite possibly as the test has to be be rerun or verified etc. Most sequencing is performed within 1 to 2 days.
But let us explore your statement:
" several days for genomic testing for a community cases who travelled widely was ok,"
- PCR Test result comes in on 1st June (Case went and got tested on 31st May)
- Genomic sequence came back late evening of 3rd.
- The Delta result was announced in The Vic Presser on June 4th
- So PCR Test to returned Genomic Sequence was 2 days
- Several: more than two but not many.
- So " several days for genomic testing for a community cases who travelled widely " is not what occurred. You have calculated the period incorrectly.
The other point is with camping family that the exact variant did not alter the immediate control measures taken by at most for more than a day.
Whereas the 3 cases matching in the HQ did alter the control measures taken by a substantial period, and the actions would have been done so earlier if known. ie The other travellers would not have been released from HQ at 14 days as there exposure period should have been extended.
So if anything the timelieness of the sequencing of the HQ cases was more critical.
But yes, the sooner the sequencing can be done the better in all cases.
but a case already in a medi hotel should be more of a concern?
Unless one has to assign a priority, it is should simply be a matter that you do need to do both.
If there are resource issues then you prioritise. I simply do not believe that 2 cases per day, and especially when there were no community cases, would lead to any appreciable delay in performing genomic sequencing.
The 3 cases before they were were moved could have infected others. Transmission within HQ is a known possibility. Transmission from within HQ is to the community a known possibility.
The Vic Kappa Outbreak was started when SA Health moved an infected person to their higher graded facility but also moved someone he had infected to their normal HQ and that person then infected Wollert Man but late in his stay .
So it is entirely possible that the first 3 in the Blu hotel could have infected others during their stay there, but that those travellers like Wollert man only become positive after their stay.