jakeseven7
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2005
- Posts
- 11,275
Last edited:
The other three? Released yet?View attachment 231207
7 new cases
Rolling average now drops again to 5 for Metro Melbourne
The massive rapid response testing of the northern cluster contacts where several hundred people are isolating has uncovered 4 new cases.
If the family provided the clearance letter to the school as stated then clearly the school didn’t read it properly.Sounds like they still need to do more work on managing cases and contacts
Devastated family may leave area after boy unknowingly took COVID-19 to school, principal says
The family at the centre of a COVID-19 cluster in Melbourne are so devastated and shaken by the situation, they have considered leaving the area, says the principal of the northern suburbs school shut down by the outbreak.www.abc.net.au
There appears to be confusion between Isolation and quarantine. I didn’t understand the difference until this week and English is my first language.If the family provided the clearance letter to the school as stated then clearly the school didn’t read it properly.
View attachment 231207
7 new cases
Rolling average now drops again to 5 for Metro Melbourne and drops in Regional VIC to 0.2 which is great news. Hopefully under 5 shortly.
The massive rapid response testing thousands of the northern cluster contacts where several hundred people are isolating has uncovered 4 new cases.
The other three? Released yet?
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
I guess it depends on whether the child who later tested positive was mentioned in the letter. That isn't clear. It may have just stated that A and B were now not considered infectious and could return to school.If the family provided the clearance letter to the school as stated then clearly the school didn’t read it properly.
I am sure that other Premiers are considering exactly the same.There were comments on ABC radio this morning (I don't know where the journos involved live ) that Premier Andrews and his team are 'working hard' to lift restrictions earlier than planned. I know my family & friends in Melbourne are aching for this to happen, and no doubt AFFers here, but in view of the emerging cluster in the north of the metro area / the college, is this the time? It doesn't look as though the messaging is yet good enough in English-second-language areas (ignoring the anti-lockdown cretins for now). Is it practicable for the cluster areas to be kept locked down themselves within Melbourne - I'm not sure what the final lessons were from earlier selective (?post code?) lock-downs. Would people cop continued restrictions based on connections with the school, if the rest of the community were granted more freedom?
A really, really, tough call; I don't envy them.
Thats what I mean. If the kids were named then the school should have realised earlier that the other kid wasnt to have returned yet.I guess it depends on whether the child who later tested positive was mentioned in the letter. That isn't clear. It may have just stated that A and B were now not considered infectious and could return to school.
Nsw mystery case watchNsw mystery case watch
Today’s reports indicate:
- 0 in the past 7 days
- 3 in the period 8-14 days
- 2 in the period 15-28 days
- 28 older than 28 days but since before Crossroads emerged.
So some natural ageing in the last 48 hour reporting period.
I think that might be expecting too much from the school to be honest. Their exclusion should have been mentioned and as that child didn't turn positive until later, they may not have even put all the facts together. The child may have never been named in any Health Comms. And I don't think that is a schools responsibility but Vic Health who were supposed to be monitoring the family members.Thats what I mean. If the kids were named then the school should have realised earlier that the other kid wasnt to have returned yet.
Thats what I mean. If the kids were named then the school should have realised earlier that the other kid wasnt to have returned yet.
I am sure that other Premiers are considering exactly the same.
I think that’s putting a load on the Principal to understand in depth what is going on, If mother turns up and says my two kids were positive, but now they are cleared and so the whole family is OK (misunderstanding on her part, but easy to see how it can occur), shows principal a letter and he accepts it.Thats what I mean. If the kids were named then the school should have realised earlier that the other kid wasnt to have returned yet.
Well they have no choice... because VIC are locking down / isolating and testing the third ring of all the school contacts regardless of where they live. Asymptomatic testing as well.
There are thousands of tests being processed and they are expecting hundreds/thousands today as well given the 15 rapid response sites set up.
VIC has done a really good job getting people in hotspots tested with these response units, far higher test numbers and faster than NSW actually did with their outbreaks, obviously more at stake in VIC but they could share these learnings with all other states as we open up, all states will be doing this. I think it would be great to share this approach.
The one is suspected to be a legacy case still shedding the virus so should come off. So likely to be zero mystery cases again.
fingers crossed for tomorrow though - I can understand how devastating this is.