Must...Fly!
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2010
- Posts
- 8,183
- Qantas
- Gold
- Virgin
- Platinum
I guess we will agree to disagree, and again I have no problem with the major events calendar in Melbourne. I absolutely acknowledge the stadiums are used outside of the Open, usually quite extensively for concerts and shows. Basketball for John Cain Arena. etc. Much of the other redevelopment has been purely for the Open.Sorry but that is simply not correct....
I do though understand you are very upset about the whole arrangement proceeding and personally I'm not sure that it should be going ahead either. I think its high risk for a state that has had a pretty nasty experience with the virus already....
Melbourne Park Redevelopment - Melbourne & Olympic Parks
The multimillion dollar Melbourne Park redevelopment will cater for the growing popularity of the Australian Open and is designed to secure the future of the event in Melbourne. Redevelopment works will place a strong emphasis on the comfort of patrons, with more open space and shade, increased...
mopt.com.au
I take it you don't yet feel that you are defending the indefensible?
Lots of people piled on NSWG over having spectators at the Sydney Test, but not so much about having India (ie a team from one of the major hotspots) in Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane where there has been community transmisson of late.
Personally I don't support the AO going ahead, nor the cricket tests. Not sure how big the cricket entourage is, and probably not the size of the AO's, but given all the limits to so many other businesses trying to make a quid I don't see why the AO or the cricket gets special treatment.
Players, staff, etc I doubt is any more than 50. After two weeks quarantine, the risk is gone, and quite importantly they are here for 2-3 months.
That pales in comparison to the 1,000-1,200 number quoted by the press for the tennis who are here for 2-3 weeks.