On the other hand what is the evidence for lockdowns.The best feature is to close borders.Those countries that closed borders to all non citizens have done better that stopped flights but still let in non citizens-North America and Europe.
Some do wonder whether going further than that plus mask wearing,social distancing and strict testing of contacts and those with symptoms really adds much more to risk prevention.The exceptions would be with known clusters such as Daegu in South Korea,Wuhan and our own North West Tasmania cluster.
For example there really is no evidence that schools are a hot bed of transmission.The QLD CMO has now admitted that-it was done to scare people.So many kids will be left behind academically and real pressure was put on parents working from home just to scare people.
Brisbane Times sat down with Dr Young to find out how she became the Chief Health Officer, why Queensland schools have remained mostly closed, and just how fearful she was about COVID-19.
www.brisbanetimes.com.au
Around the world there is little evidence that more severe lockdowns get a better result than those with less restrictions.Here in Australia Tasmania has had the most severe restrictions yet has the highest case rates and mortality.
New Zealand had more severe restrictions than Australia but have done no better.Yet they are easing restrictions faster than us.
Some go further.This by a statistician.
Also see this important update: Bad Arguments For Lockdowns & The Burden Of Proof. Also: US States Analysis. The US has a little more than 4% of the world population. Yet, throughout the end o…
wmbriggs.com
And then you have in the midst of a severe lockdown someone denying one of the things that seems to have worked.This by the NYC Health Commissioner who was telling people in March to go to mass gatherings.
New York City’s health commissioner blew off an urgent NYPD request for 500,000 surgical masks as the coronavirus crisis mounted — telling a high-ranking police official that “I d…
nypost.com