The context I used it as an example of is that public officials should not breach privacy of individuals unless there is a publuc need.
The naming was was done as a mistake and the Minister released it was wrong and that is why he apologised as he did not want other public officials or the media outing people.
If you read my original post to Pushka you will see that was how I used the example.
It is a good example too as the Minister was very open about why it was not appropriate. And very open on why people should not be identified by public officials including himself.
Just because people can find out the names of people by various means does not make it ok to breach their privacy, or to name them.
It can also be quite dangerous to do so.
This is why the state health organisations do not name the positive cases.
Start
naming people and watch
violence and other undesirable actions start to occur.
www.theaustralian.com.au