Pushka
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2011
- Posts
- 29,112
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Red
And being so remote, mining continued unabated and simply shipped out across the world without any impact.Dunno where he gets his facts but the restrictions on movements of people in the Northern Beaches did not remotely approach 3 months! It was 3 weeks and affected 250k people, which is 1/10th of the people affected by the 3 day lockdowns in greater Perth.
The only restriction that went for 3 months inside NSW following NB outbreak was the need to wear a mask on PT - I seriously doubt that mask wearing resulted in significant economic loss he is claiming.
Most of the economic damage was actually caused by other states (WA at the forefront) unnecessarily over reacting and closing their borders to the whole state of NSW as a result, instead of properly using the hotspot definitions which should have only prevented those from NB and anyone who had visited an exposure site.
I caught part of the presser last night and he said something along the lines of NSW keeps opening then having to lock down like London, I gagged. As this isn't true at all. There was the initial lockdown in March 2020 (which was pretty much national) and then two hotspot focussed movement restrictions firstly in NB for 3 weeks over xmas and then the Northern Rivers for 3 days (due to Brisbane hens night).
He fails to acknowledge the only reason WA economy is doing better than most is due to mining, the WA tourism is suffering just as much (if not more than) those in other states - as they have locked out domestic travelers for more of the last year than anywhere else in Aus. he also never mentioned how much WA lost because NSW residents cancelled xmas travel plans to WA (this wont have been immaterial).