I totally agree that their isolation arrangements should be different. Do not pass Go, do not collect....To think that senior pollies should go to general public HQ is ludicrous.
I totally agree that their isolation arrangements should be different. Do not pass Go, do not collect....To think that senior pollies should go to general public HQ is ludicrous.
Yes, lock up the decision makers, then propose to operate the country without our elected. Smart much?I totally agree that their isolation arrangements should be different. Do not pass Go, do not collect....
They want us to act like we are all in it together and to take one for the team (eg vaccinate when there is no real personal benefit or need),
As more people are vaccinated, this could come to be a common feature of Covid outbreaks. The problem has always been asymptomatic carriers.
Possibly one of his US execs flew to Australia and was possibly still contagious after quarantine.
I didn't realise that was the timing, it was a detail I didn't pick up.Perhaps, but patient zero (the US traveler with the genomic match) was still in HQ when the BBQ guy was infected, so if he go it from another traveller they must have tested negative and been discharged before patient zero.
Oh no. He must have caught it over Zoom!Perhaps, but patient zero (the US traveler with the genomic match) was still in HQ when the BBQ guy was infected, so if he got it from another traveler they must have tested negative and been discharged before patient zero.
The BBQ guy has been identified and he is an Executive of a Venture Capital group who was inspecting BBQ galore sites with a view to purchasing the chain. Possibly one of his US execs flew to Australia and was possibly still contagious after quarantine.
I didn't realise that was the timing, it was a detail I didn't pick up.
Just to clarify on what second ring is again as it it is not quarantining casual contacts.
Second ring for contacts of close contacts, and casual contacts, is only requiring them to get tested and isolate till a negative test is obtained. For the vast majority of people these days this is often less than 24 hours. My tests in Vic and Qld have been results back in less than half a day.
People who have only visited an exposure site at the designated time range as a positive are casual contacts and as such just get tested and only isolate till a negative test is obtained. No quarantine period applies.
It is only close contacts that are required to quarantine for 14 days regardless of test results. ie People that have a reasonably long exposure time with a positive person (or where a positive person has been such as a cleaner) whether this is at an exposure site, .home, workplace, HQ etc.
So if you visit a shopping centre you will be a casual contact. If you sit at a cafe at a table next to a positive person you will be deemed a close contact.
This is what the second ring method is.
That would be a third ring? Contacts of close contacts of close contacts...?In other states there have been cases of contacts of household members of close and casual contacts being forced to test and iso, which results in much larger group of people being locked down.
I definitely don't want 300 or more people a day to die! And if it was anywhere near that, I would take one for the team and get the shot right now - but we bubble along with 1 or 2 community cases in total, not even every day. And I will eventually get vaccinated - I'm not against the vaccination per se, more that as a fit 60 yo with no underlying conditions, and living in the ACT, my personal risk of COVID with complications is much lower than my risk of clots from the vaccine. And add to that the statements by the PM and health minister, as recently as Saturday that even vaccination will not lead to borders opening. I feel a lot of vaccine inertia.I know this year has been very hard on you with the separation from your son and I totally get that, with my son overseas as well, although I am more fortunate as I now have 2 in Australia.
however they want us to get vaccinated not to meet some Machiavellian purpose, but to stop us getting a pretty nasty disease with high fatality rates for over 60s.
the road to home quarantine and more open borders lies through a high rate of people vaccinated.
I sometimes think they need to open the borders and let 300 or 400 people a day die and maybe Australians will wake up to the real world
I would certainly agree that there is not enough of a push to make people want to be vaccinated.I definitely don't want 300 or more people a day to die! And if it was anywhere near that, I would take one for the team and get the shot right now - but we bubble along with 1 or 2 community cases in total, not even every day. And I will eventually get vaccinated - I'm not against the vaccination per se, more that as a fit 60 yo with no underlying conditions, and living in the ACT, my personal risk of COVID with complications is much lower than my risk of clots from the vaccine. And add to that the statements by the PM and health minister, as recently as Saturday that even vaccination will not lead to borders opening. I feel a lot of vaccine inertia.
So what will tip me over to get vaccinated faster is actually the reverse of your logic " the road to home quarantine and more open borders lies through a high rate of people vaccinated". I just do not trust that this will happen, given the statements of the politicians. I need an incentive that motivates me - and that would be "the road to a high rate of people vaccinated lies through open borders and home quarantine."
I know and appreciate that other people have a different risk calculation, be that from their age or their underlying health conditions.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements