I read something at one time and I'm really frustrated that I can't remember who or when. I'm thinking John Ruskin but haven't nailed it down.
The gist was that when a scientist states something, they're generally wrong. That's my view of the current Tasmanian modelling. It may be right, it may be wrong. There are so many variables involved that I do not believe that any modelling can predict that after six months, there'll be this many infections and this many deaths. It's informed guess work and they'd do just as well to slaughter a chicken and examine the entrails.