AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Never read any comments, but if there's raw data you can sometimes make up your own mind.If you follow AV herald the truth will be hard to establish, it’s like Wikipedia in the early days!
I wouldn't expect terminal radar to be able to see a SAM, though I suppose it's not all that relevant.GPS jamming doesn’t affect Radar, it affects data coming from the plane via transponders. Aktau has TAR and SSR in addition to ADSB, and unlike ADSB the TAR would show other airborne “objects”.
Presumably with IFF turned on. Airliners aren't all that fast, especially down low, so it smacks of trigger happy. On the other hand, it seems the USN managed to shoot down an F18 whilst it was on approach, so they aren't the only ones guilty of that.Has been some talk that the diversion could have caused confusion to the local air defence teams on who it was, as no aircraft was expected in this area from Grozny to Aktau, which also flying in the direction towards Moscow. Something that was moving incredible fast in the direction of Moscow, split second decision, launch or not.
I'm not convinced that they consider civil aviation at all.The defence teams probably don’t factor in diversions into their planning. Especially those heading in the direction of Moscow.
You're too likely to be correct.This probably won’t be the last either.
Pretty much the same as UA232.The fact so many survived is a credit to the crew. Sadly they hit the engine on the ground first which essentially created the fireball, but for that many to walk away, certainly an impressive effort.
And you also end up with issues of translations of translations causing many of the media reports to confuse what happened with the JL/JPCG incident at HND in Jan.I'd be wary of direct translations of the radio comms. It loses a lot of the actual meaning when taken out of the local aviation language. I wouldn't be surprised if 'bird' is actually the term for a missile. I don't think you could mix the two events up.