Baggage Enhancements [oneworld]

Status
Not open for further replies.
I suspect that the apparent lowest common denominator of *O interlining only with *O and *A interlining only with *A on seperate tickets is contractually mandated.
 
It looks like some good improvements, but I'm not terribly a fan of BA opting out of things like usual! If they're not interested in providing the benefits perhaps they shouldn't be in the alliance!

Priority baggage on all OW carriers (excluding BA) will be good for some :)

Not sure what you mean ?
BA most certainly does provide priority baggage for OW elites IME.
The only exclusion I can see is for their "Hand Baggage Only Fares" and they also apply that exclusion to their own Golds and Silvers.

EDIT: Just read the other links apart from the OW press release and I see what you mean.
This doesn't however reflect my experience with BA where my bags have had Priority tags and lately First tags on my recent flights with them.
 
I also have experienced priority baggage as a OWS without needed to ask when travelling in Y. It seemed to go hand in hand with being able to use the business checkin counters. However it being an official OW policy is a positive IMO, and don't support views - well that's not really an improvement.

Extra Kgs on the other hand, woohoo, great benefit!!
 
Australia's highest-earning Velocity Frequent Flyer credit card: Offer expires: 30 Apr 2025
- Earn 100,000 bonus Velocity Points
- Get unlimited Virgin Australia Lounge access
- Enjoy a complimentary return Virgin Australia domestic flight each year

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Exactly. These are existing/ad hoc agreements.

Not *A mandate.

No exactly.
When I asked to transfer luggage from QF to OZ I was firmly told no can do, although both airlines have codeshare agreement. But when I tried to transfer OZ to QF (with very low expectations) to my surprise they managed to do it for me.
Another example is TG to RJ but not vv.
Rules may have changed over the years but generally speaking *A is more flexible with luggage transfers to other alliances IME.
 
No exactly.
When I asked to transfer luggage from QF to OZ I was firmly told no can do, although both airlines have codeshare agreement. But when I tried to transfer OZ to QF (with very low expectations) to my surprise they managed to do it for me.
Another example is TG to RJ but not vv.
Rules may have changed over the years but generally speaking *A is more flexible with luggage transfers to other alliances IME.

Which means very little in light of "benefits of (an) alliance", let alone the better alliance. Just because within an alliance it so happens there are quite a few carriers which have several interlines, that's not a (gazetted) benefit of that alliance. But if the ability to check through interline across the alliances is that important to you, then so be it.

Interestingly, QF and OZ have an interline baggage and ticket issuance agreement, however we know that fairly recently QF has tightened considerably on what they will check in, viz. restricted mainly to *O and some other partners. This is especially true if both are on separate tickets, let alone the OZ is issued on the OZ flight number, not the QF flight number.

Also, there's little point for interline if it is to QF domestic, since all bags need to be reclaimed anyway. But you might have had something like ICN [OZ] SIN [QF] BNE.

For whatever it is worth, getting tickets which include airlines across more than one alliance and that have no long standing interline or bilateral agreement within the same journey, is not common.
 
Which means very little in light of "benefits of (an) alliance", let alone the better alliance. Just because within an alliance it so happens there are quite a few carriers which have several interlines, that's not a (gazetted) benefit of that alliance. But if the ability to check through interline across the alliances is that important to you, then so be it.

When flying between continents it's often necessary to go with different airlines which not always belong to one alliance. It's not pleasant to go out, collect the luggage and then sit on a bench waiting for check-in (instead of relaxing in the lounge) when the connection is over 3 hours and it can be very stressful when connection is under 1 hour. So yes, I think this is one aspect that sets *A apart from the rest.
 
[I hope AFFers don;t think Gold getting something means a devaluation of platinum, but I suspect they will....]
Are you saying if Gold benefits don't differ much from Platinum benefits that's not a devaluation of Platinum?

Why not offer all Gold members the same benefits as Platinum members?
 
When flying between continents it's often necessary to go with different airlines which not always belong to one alliance. It's not pleasant to go out, collect the luggage and then sit on a bench waiting for check-in (instead of relaxing in the lounge) when the connection is over 3 hours and it can be very stressful when connection is under 1 hour. So yes, I think this is one aspect that sets *A apart from the rest.

But you are getting confused here. It is not an alliance benefit as others have mentioned, it is up to each specific airline to set their own interline conditions.
 
But you are getting confused here. It is not an alliance benefit as others have mentioned, it is up to each specific airline to set their own interline conditions.

It's just happen that these airlines belong to a specific alliance. Call it an airline benefit or an alliance benefit, it doesn't change the bottom line - some *A airlines allow luggage connections to OW airlines but not vv.
Anyway, sorry for getting too much off topic.
 
It's just happen that these airlines belong to a specific alliance. Call it an airline benefit or an alliance benefit, it doesn't change the bottom line - some *A airlines allow luggage connections to OW airlines but not vv. Anyway, sorry for getting too much off topic.
STaying off topic, but the use of the word interlining on this forum is pretty sloppy. Interlining basically occurs when tickets for multiple carriers are issued on one ticket, and most legacy carriers have interline agreements with other legacy carriers. In most cases on this board, when folk ask about interlining, they are actually asking about baggage through check. On a single ticket this is not an issue, most interline agreements have baggage through check policies as well. The problem is, folk want to extend this when they are on single tickets, which isn't really interlining. Baggage through check requires an agreement between the two airlines, and then the check-in airline has to agree to through check if the second airline is on a separate ticket. Star is not always better - anecdotally I have heard ANZ won't even throcuh check on its own services if on separate tickets.
 
But you are getting confused here. It is not an alliance benefit as others have mentioned, it is up to each specific airline to set their own interline conditions.
Intelining is a mutual contractual agreement between two airlines.
 
I guess there's more *A carriers, so more chance of finding one with a through check on separate tickets to a non alliance carrier.

... Indeed - Air NZ will not through check to Air NZ on separate tickets.

If you need to pray your luggage arrives you can't afford to lose it.
icon_wink.gif
No - I've given up - I simply don't check luggage!
 
Are you saying if Gold benefits don't differ much from Platinum benefits that's not a devaluation of Platinum?...
Hmmm ... Just noticed - this extra allowance is somewhat limited - basically fly First/Businessand it will be difficult to benefit.

For the "Piece System" - it's an additional bag only if the allowance was one Piece originally; with the weight system it is only 15kg over the economy allowance.
 
I guess there's more *A carriers, so more chance of finding one with a through check on separate tickets to a non alliance carrier.

... Indeed - Air NZ will not through check to Air NZ on separate tickets.

No - I've given up - I simply don't check luggage!
And that is the best solution! :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top